Creeps on this site re Juliette Lewis
-
lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 10:13 AM)
I love it, all the phases of hotness. there is nothing wrong with lusting after a 15 year old or 13 year old girl. people are stupid saying these things are wrong or unlawful. fuc# the age of consent when it comes to girls 15 or older.
-
DracTarashV — 14 years ago(October 06, 2011 10:58 PM)
Ah, who cares OP? At the time she was 17 a little old, don't you think? Ha ha. But I did find her um, sexy. Her legs in particular, were incredibly hot! In the amazing theater scene, where Cady begins to stick his thumb in her mouth, and she begins to suck it - then they proceed with a helluva kiss it's hot stuff. Don't see what's wrong about being attracted to a 17/18 year broad. Oh, and to the post above, Emma Watson was pretty damn hot in the 5th dull Potter film. She as well, was reaching adulthood by then, but she manage to look really good. Plus, she's older than me, so what the heck.
-
lukejbarnett2002 — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 10:16 AM)
I know exactly people are so ignorant getting caught up in the age of consent and the age of 18 so much that they just can't see how it can be ok to have sex with a 17 year old girl, like one year is going to make that much of a difference in her life, or two years, or three years. 15 should be the age of consent everywhere in America. think of all the less crime we would have if it was this way. bottom line is regardless of what the age of consent is people are going to have sex at any age. the only thing that matters is how the kids are raised.
-
Phazzle — 14 years ago(November 25, 2011 08:22 AM)
Wow, chill the beep out! How is it sick for a man to appreciate a young woman's beauty? It's not as if there is some switch in my testes that shuts them off when I am looking at a girl who is younger than 18 years old. If it has breasts and a female figure then three million years of evolution has programmed me to ogle it. That doesn't mean that I am going to act on my urges.
Methinks I read the laments of a jealous dried up old woman.
http://phazzle.blogspot.com -
Phazzle — 14 years ago(February 16, 2012 01:16 PM)
Wowsers what a bitchy thing to say. Why then is it "creepy," to be attracted to a younger woman who is of legal age? Would it be creepy if I were a 35-year-old cougar lusting after a 18-year-old boy?
Women mistakenly assume that because a man is attracted to them physically that:
a) He can't control that attraction.
-and-
b) He is willing to put up with all of her beep in exchange for the sex that she graciously bestows upon him.
Neither is the case. Stop pretending that we cannot resist you.
BTWNews beep flash! Men generally prefer younger women. Deal with it.
http://phazzle.blogspot.com -
Tales-from-the-Goondocks — 14 years ago(February 16, 2012 01:19 PM)
Would it be creepy if I were a 35-year-old cougar lusting after a 18-year-old boy?
Yes it would. An 18 year old boy still looks kind of like a kid.
Women mistakenly assume that because a man is attracted to them physically that:
a) He can't control that attraction.
I agree. Women usually think that.
BTWNews beep flash! Men generally prefer younger women. Deal with it.
That doesn't change the fact that a 30 something yo lusting over a teenager, even if she's already 18, is just plain creepy. -
Phazzle — 14 years ago(February 17, 2012 07:40 AM)
"Lusting over?" At what point does attraction turn into lust? You just don't get it and I am getting tired of explaining it to you. When I see a pretty, fully developed, woman I automatically feel attraction. I might not even realize until after I have felt it that she is not the appropriate age. If I do realize it then it stops. Just because you feel something doesn't make it motivating. I understand that may be a hard concept for women to wrap their heads around.
For instance, there is a pretty 25-year-old girl that I work with. I don't typically date women that I work with but I was intrigued so I started talking with her and I realized that she and I have very little in common and that put her in a category of potential partner that is not conducive to a working environment. You can have a fling with a stranger or you can have a relationship with a co-worker but it causes problems to have a fling with a co-worker. So, in short, the attraction remains but the impulse is easily controlled. There are plenty of women that are attractive that are not co-workers.
An 18-year-old girl poses problems. First, she is too young to take to a bar. Second, you would probably get flack for dating her from people like you. The risks outweigh the benefits. A 21-year-old girl is anatomically indifferent from her 18-year-old counterpart but is advanced enough that only the most ridiculous of people would object to her dating an older man, even if he is in his 40s. At some point there must be a cutoff.
http://phazzle.blogspot.com -
Tales-from-the-Goondocks — 14 years ago(February 17, 2012 12:59 PM)
I'm a 24 yo heterosexual male. I'm not a woman and I'm not a christian, but I still think it would be amazingly creepy for a 30 something yo to go around looking at teenage girls. There IS difference between a 21 yo girl and an 18 yo girl. 18 yo are usually still mama girls. Even if you think 18 yo girls are already mature enough because law says so, you would be wrong, because most 18 yo are still pretty immature and I would know that because I studied human development during my college years in human sciences. Even if a 21 yo is a 100% complete woman. I would still say that it is creepy for a 40 something yo to look at a woman who could be her own daughter.
There is nothing to "get" here that I'm not getting. In your opinion it is fine to have 30 something yo checking out teenage girls. In my opinion it is just creepy. -
Phazzle — 14 years ago(February 17, 2012 02:31 PM)
Really? How do you have an opinion on this if you are neither 30 nor a woman?
Your "college years?" What? You mean "last year," right? One day when you ARE a 30 year-old man you will look at a 19 year-old woman and observe the presence of a reaction in your genetalia. Remember this conversation when you do.
Bye.
http://phazzle.blogspot.com -
Kevinology_Rises — 12 years ago(September 04, 2013 10:20 PM)
Christ, it seems every movie that has an under age girl in it, someone is whining about
something
to do with her being sexualized.
It distracts from
actual
paedophiles and real creeps who slip under the radar often unnoticed beneath the sea of whiners bitching and moaning because some dude made a sexual remark about a girl who's 17 and 11 months. It's preposterous, there are
real
monsters out there who fancy 4 year-old
children
and gleefully walk the legal tightrope so they can't be arrested for their often questionable behaviour, and you're complaining about meaningless bollocks like this.
I'm a 24 yo heterosexual male.
Good for you, I'm a 26 year-old heterosexual male, I'm not entirely sure what this has to do with it, but okay
I'm not a woman and I'm not a christian, but I still think it would be amazingly creepy for a 30 something yo to go around looking at teenage girls. There IS difference between a 21 yo girl and an 18 yo girl. 18 yo are usually still mama girls. Even if you think 18 yo girls are already mature enough because law says so, you would be wrong, because most 18 yo are still pretty immature and I would know that because I studied human development during my college years in human sciences. Even if a 21 yo is a 100% complete woman. I would still say that it is creepy for a 40 something yo to look at a woman who could be her own daughter.
I find it incredibly worrying that you supposedly studied human development in college and yet don't understand the difference between sexual attraction and emotional attraction. It makes absolutely no difference what a girl's maturity level is when you're looking at her physical image, the only time maturity becomes a factor is in
dating
this person or having sex with them. This is the mistake so many people like yourself make when arrogantly judging others for what is perfectly normal biological human behaviour because you've probably been raised by the American media and Chris Hansen to believe that anyone who's a teenager is an undeveloped baby. If you walk past an attractive woman in the street, your brain doesn't say "Mmmm, damn, look at that maturity level wouldn't mind a bit of that intelligence " The normal reaction is to admire her face or body, breasts, legs etc., and the same can be said of
any
girl who is far enough into puberty to be physically developed.
And what difference does it make whether or not she "could be his daughter"? That's almost as laughable a non-sequitur as something another idiot once said about the girl being "just barely able to drive", as if any of this is relevant. That's like me saying that because my girlfriend is in the same age group as me, she could be my sister (assuming I had one). Yes, but she's not, so why does that matter?
You're
young enough to be my brother, does that have any bearing whatsoever on
anything?
You're also ignoring the fact that people of
any
age can be immature, should you walk up to a fully grown 30 year-old woman and ask her if she's mentally mature before giving your penis permission to stand up? Talk sense.
There is nothing to "get" here that I'm not getting. In your opinion it is fine to have 30 something yo checking out teenage girls. In my opinion it is just creepy.
There is a
lot
you're not getting. It
is
absolutely fine to check out teenage girls, I wouldn't advise staring because that's rude to anyone regardless of age, but I see no moral issue whatsoever with simply
looking
at a healthy girl of breeding age and finding her attractive, it's bloody human nature, ya prude.
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man." -
Tales-from-the-Goondocks — 12 years ago(September 05, 2013 08:55 AM)
Oh God, not another stupid creep who thinks he can justify his creepy desires. Just shut the fck up. I won't even read your stupid ignorant post, it would be a pointless exercise, I've already wasted hours of my life refuting ignorant a*holes like you before and you NEVER accept you are wrong. The only thing you creeps do after I show you how ignorant your arguments are is delete your own posts. So there's nothing to argue about here, you are a creep and that's it. beep ignorant dumbass.
-
Kevinology_Rises — 12 years ago(September 06, 2013 06:12 AM)
I can absolutely guarantee you that not only will I not delete my post, but I will bow down and call you King if you can truly refute everything I've said. By all means, I'm very eager to see how ignorant my arguments apparently are, it's easy to say I'm wrong when you don't have the balls to address anything I said other than to call me names and tell me to shut up. The only ignorant one here is you, lad.
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."