Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Whats the point of this 1991 movie being set in 1996?

Whats the point of this 1991 movie being set in 1996?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
12 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man


    jonieblon — 15 years ago(August 06, 2010 05:55 PM)

    What cinematic value did this addexcept seeing gas prices at circa 2003 levels?
    You pipple mek my ass twitch

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      idn82 — 15 years ago(August 24, 2010 02:41 PM)

      You know, I often ask myself the same question. It makes the movie slightly futuristic, I guess. But why?
      Maybe the director/writer thought it was cool to do a buddy action-comedy that is set in the near future?? It's still a strange decision though. 😛

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Lunchbox-3 — 14 years ago(April 29, 2011 11:19 AM)

        Kind of like Strange Days coming out in 1995 or whenever and being set in 1999, a distant future when we would all have digital recording devices that could jack into our brains. Because that could happen in 4 years' time.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          RS-Bundy — 14 years ago(June 03, 2011 11:38 AM)

          I don't think anyone could fathom living beyone the millenium back in the 20th century.
          If it aint moving, you can eat it!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            mikey1969 — 11 years ago(October 04, 2014 10:10 PM)

            A: If you can't figure out why Strange Days was set in '99, you must have been very young at the time. Everything was about the new "millennium"(Even though it was actually 200-01). Kind of natural to set a futuristic movie then.
            B: If we couldn't have had something to "jack into our brains in only 4 years' time", you also must have been very young in '07, which is when the first iPhone came out(As well as the rest of the smartphones). In 7 years' time, phones have gone from "Why would I need a phone that did
            that
            ? I have a perfectly good computer." to "Jesus, what do you MEAN I can't get a "dumb" phone for my kid? He doesn't need a "data plan". Just for reference, the iPad debuted in '10.
            In other words, you would be amazed how quickly tech sneaks up on us. 4 years is a l-o-n-g time

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              TVippy — 10 years ago(May 23, 2015 03:59 AM)

              LOL, iPhone is still an unnecessary toy and it did revolutionize nothing.

              I own you.
              https://goo.gl/0avZjB

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                IMDb User

                This message has been deleted.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  lastironman — 13 years ago(May 19, 2012 06:20 PM)

                  Well, I think that it was really about how Harley and Marlboro and their friends were supposed to be sort of the last of a dying breed, but present day 1991 was kinda too soon to portray that as such. '96 may have been too soon for that as well, but whatever

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    tyfmorgan — 13 years ago(January 03, 2013 01:42 AM)

                    I always assumed it was to set up the new drug "Crystal Dream" being on the streets and the fact that Burbank had become an airport. They just needed it a couple years into the future for that to be possible.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      Max06 — 12 years ago(April 11, 2013 05:09 AM)

                      It's also a lot easier to set the story in the "future" and still be able to use existing cityscapes, vehicles, etc. when the budget is tight.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        WarpedRecord — 12 years ago(January 15, 2014 11:38 PM)

                        Good point. I think it's an interesting angle, to be slightly futuristic but not to the point of the "Jetsons." The future here is as believable as anything else in this film, which probably isn't saying much.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          Joc Spader — 3 years ago(July 23, 2022 08:30 PM)

                          What cinematic value did this add…except seeing gas prices at circa 2003 levels?
                          You pipple mek my ass twitch
                          Watched this again last night. The gas prices at the station Mickey Rourke pulls into at the beginning used to say $4.99 a gallon. Now it's been Mandela Effected to show $3.99, a price today would seem fair.
                          Tell you what…When I send my ex-wife her money…you can lick the stamps.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups