like a hard PG-13 or maybe even an R, not a PG, I mean just for its sexual content.

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — HouseSitter

---

CALICOWBOY1017 — 15 years ago(June 23, 2010 08:31 PM)

like a hard PG-13 or maybe even an R, not a PG, I mean just for its sexual content.

[fgadmin]

woofagooba — 15 years ago(August 06, 2010 09:36 PM)

What sexual content? There was very little, the closest thing to it was the scene with Newton and Becky. Newton and Gwen were never even seen in bed together. It was no where near an R and there wasn't even any talk to make it a PG-13. I don't know what movie you watched.

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

dabukaba — 13 years ago(May 19, 2012 03:57 PM)

Actually I still think it would be rated R today for the graphic sex scene.

[fgadmin]

suednim1960 — 13 years ago(October 15, 2012 08:47 AM)

What graphic sex scene? Did we watch the same movie?

[fgadmin]

Mixalidis — 13 years ago(December 03, 2012 07:57 AM)

I have to say I am quite surprised by its PG rating because there was some swearing, sex references and such.

[fgadmin]

Galagatron — 12 years ago(May 04, 2013 01:11 PM)

That could still be a PG in 1992.

[fgadmin]

shinigamisnight — 12 years ago(June 06, 2013 04:46 PM)

Yep. I still find it interesting that how many late 80s/early 90s PG/G movies would never be able to get a PG rating today (this movie definitely included and 'who framed roger rabbit' would never have been released as it was back then. It would have been more heavily edited to get a PG. Oh and there's 'all dogs go to heaven').
♩Where's my fish?! Where's my fish?! It's dead; got to get a new fish! Where-!♩

[fgadmin]

spookyrat1 — 11 years ago(March 13, 2015 05:56 PM)

I mean just for its sexual content.
the graphic sex scene.
As one of the other posters asked, "Did we watch the same movie"?