Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Did Jack Barry Know About The Rigging?

Did Jack Barry Know About The Rigging?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
8 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Quiz Show


    jbartelone — 14 years ago(December 03, 2011 12:22 PM)

    I heard that he had passed a polygraph saying that he did not. I know that Monty Hall subed for Jack in around the summer of 1956 for a few episodes. Did he know what was going on?
    Joe

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      MyDarkStar — 14 years ago(December 06, 2011 08:45 AM)

      I got the impression that he did know about it since he did the double take on the Emily Dickinson question. He expected the incorrect answer, but got the right one.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        EJF — 13 years ago(September 12, 2012 03:36 PM)

        In a 2008 article about the scandal for The New Yorker, Van Doren admitted that Freedman, Enright and Barry all knew about the rigging.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          IMDb User

          This message has been deleted.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            Eric-62-2 — 11 years ago(February 16, 2015 12:50 PM)

            First off, the Emily Dickinson moment in the film is pure fiction among many things in this film that are fiction (not the least of which was Redford turning a man who had next to NOTHING to do with the investigation, Richard Goodwin, into the hero for reasons that I am convinced are rooted entirely in politics). Barry didn't react to anything in the broadcast. But that said, he did admit his general knowledge of the rigging (though not all the minute details) in an interview on the Tomorrow program in the 1970s and again in an interview for the late 80s documentary "Television" (his interview was filmed before his death in 1984, four years before the documentary aired).

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              smoko — 10 years ago(May 31, 2015 06:04 AM)

              @Eric-62-2
              First off, the Emily Dickinson moment in the film is pure fiction
              Well, not
              pure
              fiction. According to "Television Fraud: The History and Implications of the Quiz Show Scandals" the Emily Dickinson moment did happen, but it was producer Albert Freedman (Hank Azaria) who was shocked, not Jack Barry:
              https://books.google.com.au/books?id=mQFPP7kikegC&pg=PA76&lpg=PA76&dq="Snodgrass+shocked+freedman+by+answering"&source=bl&ots=pnarHgElpg&sig=AOXlrEbxTlcM903du0_zdlRyFwU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=_wFrVemIEeavmAW3n4LADg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q="Snodgrass shocked freedman by answering"&f=false
              So Jack Barry knew that the shows were fixed, but he didn't know that Snodgrass was refusing to take a dive at that moment.
              It would be terrific to see the actual footage of that moment anyway.
              You can read dueling testimonies about how Freedman reacted here:
              http://archive.org/stream/investigationoft01unit/investigationoft01unit_djvu.txt
              I said, "Why did you do it?" And he said, "Because I wanted to win." Which is a logical answer, you know.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                vmarinaccio76 — 9 years ago(August 29, 2016 11:55 AM)

                Since the show was rigged it's very difficult to believe that the host of the show wouldn't of been in on it.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  Eric-62-2 — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 10:12 PM)

                  Well that actually was the case on other game shows of the 50s that were rigged. The first game show that was exposed for rigging was a daytime game show called "Dotto" and its host, Jack Narz, was not involved with the fixing that was going on. But unlike Jack Barry, who was the co-producer of the whole production team, Narz was just a hired gun and thus there was no reason for him to be involved in behind-the-scenes rigging. He emerged unscathed from the scandal and continued to host game shows into the late 70s (he was also the brother of another game show host legend, Tom Kennedy).

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0

                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Groups