A Not So Subtle Message For Those Of The Christian Faith?
-
russedav — 12 years ago(October 28, 2013 03:24 PM)
Only to those who don't know what the Constitution actually says. Only ignorant bigots fail to know America was founded as a Christian nation "endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights." Anyone who denies this (e.g. 0bamamaniacs enslaved to our first atheist Muslim white house occupant, not legally elected president) is himself enslaved and only points one ignorant finger at Christians to have three pointing back at himself, 3x guiltier, proving by his accusations that he knows nothing whatsoever about the faith he attacks, like anything about the Bible he mindlessly attacks, enslaved to the antiscience trash of bogus plagiarist misotheist clergyman Darwin contrary to the true science of greats like creationists Galileo, Pasteur & Von Braun and countless others. True science, like America, was founded by creationist Christians; the little we have today is being destroyed by evolutionists devoted to shredding what little's left of that Christian foundation as civilization crumbles around us in the mad rush of 0bamanation and others to return to the evil, vile barbarism whence the true Christian faith (vs bogus caricatures) rescued us. See creation.com for the few who can handle the truth that evolution is garbage by useful idiots for useful idiots, something I researched independently for myself in 1975 in college unlike today where the gullible think what they're told to think. The internet has been the glorious death knell for evolution now that its priests and media no longer control the microphone to keep creationists from speaking as they once did as deluded falsely-so-called "liberal" fascists like the evolutionists that opposed creationist Galileo, trying to prevent his geokinetic truth from hindering their geocentric system. If evolutionists had controlled science from then until now we'd still be told to believe the sun revolved around the earth thanks to their "consensus" "science" like today's "anthropocentric global warming" fraud exposed by publicizing the lies of the East Anglia crowd that "cooked the books" to make $ off gullible tree huggers vainlly pretending to know anything about science or reality or the Christian faith, but whose true knowledge about any of it is zero, zero, and zero, only what they're told to think, like on "Outer Limits" where the show itself tells us that everything we see and hear is CONTROLLED by the Controller. Outer Limits watchers who attack the Christian faith are blind hypocrites utterly blind to what they're attacking. In addition to www.creation.com, see www.desiringGod.org and www.hopeinGod.org if you dare try to handle the truth that will set you free.
-
ZAROVE — 10 years ago(November 05, 2015 04:39 AM)
russedav -
Only to those who don't know what the Constitution actually says.
Oh, I know what it saysand about the men who wrote it.
Only ignorant bigots fail to know America was founded as a Christian nation
Well, the Constitution is nt what America was fouded on, It wasn;'t even the original Document America was governed under.
Its taken on that sort of central role, but its not the original foundation.
And the original Foundation of Americ was open rebellion againt a Christian Government and Christian King.
Which violates Romans 13, by the way.
And do you know much aout King George as a man? He wasn't the Tyrant he was depicted as by Americas less than Honest Foudners.
"endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights." Anyone who denies this (e.g. 0bamamaniacs enslaved to our first atheist Muslim white house occupant, not legally elected president)
Obama does not deny this. Nor is he an Atheist, and certiahly not an Atheist Muslim.
In Reality he is a Christian.
Also, he was legally elected.
is himself enslaved and only points one ignorant finger at Christians to have three pointing back at himself,
Obama doe snot condemn Christians in general, so your entire point is invalid.
3x guiltier, proving by his accusations that he knows nothing whatsoever about the faith he attacks, like anything about the Bible he mindlessly attacks, enslaved to the antiscience trash of bogus plagiarist misotheist clergyman Darwin contrary to the true science of greats like creationists Galileo, Pasteur & Von Braun and countless others.
Galileo wa born before Darwin, and may not have been a Creationist. Pasteur was also arond before Darwin but did live in his lifetime, but guess what? He accepted Evolution. So did Von Braun. He was a Lutheran, and tyically Lutherans are not Creatioists.
True science, like America, was founded by creationist Christians;
Actually the idea of gradual Creation and more allegorical readings of Scripture were common int he Middle Ages and even in the Early Modern Period, even amongst Protestants.
Creatioism is a fairly new innovation.
the little we have today is being destroyed by evolutionists devoted to shredding what little's left of that Christian foundation as civilization crumbles around us in the mad rush of 0bamanation and others to return to the evil, vile barbarism whence the true Christian faith (vs bogus caricatures) rescued us.
You do know that many Christias accept Evolutin, Right? And beleiving in volution doesnt mean oen is an Atheist? Or immoral?
See creation.com for the few who can handle the truth that evolution is garbage by useful idiots for useful idiots, something I researched independently for myself in 1975 in college unlike today where the gullible think what they're told to think.
Then present a Reasoned arguent, nt just cheap insult.
The internet has been the glorious death knell for evolution now that its priests and media no longer control the microphone to keep creationists from speaking as they once did as deluded falsely-so-called "liberal" fascists like the evolutionists that opposed creationist Galileo, trying to prevent his geokinetic truth from hindering their geocentric system. If evolutionists had controlled science from then until now we'd still be told to believe the sun revolved around the earth thanks to their "consensus" "science" like today's "anthropocentric global warming" fraud exposed by publicizing the lies of the East Anglia crowd that "cooked the books" to make $ off gullible tree huggers vainlly pretending to know anything about science or reality or the Christian faith, but whose true knowledge about any of it is zero, zero, and zero, only what they're told to think, like on "Outer Limits" where the show itself tells us that everything we see and hear is CONTROLLED by the Controller.
OK, Heliocentrism is not related to Evolution so there's no Reaos tot hink Evolutionists woudl still have us ebelifve it. This is liek when Atheits argue the Bible is a Flat Earht book, tis stupidity.
And many Christians accept Global Warming, which is not a Theological topic at all.
And plenty of peopel disagree wiht you and still hink for themselves.
Outer Limits watchers who attack the Christian faith are blind hypocrites utterly blind to what they're attacking. In addition to www.creation.com, see www.desiringGod.org and www.hopeinGod.org if you dare try to handle the truth that will set you free.
You gave them no Reason to, as you basically insulted them, which makes them defensive. -
ZAROVE — 10 years ago(November 05, 2015 04:28 AM)
jbaker1-2 -
Hardly surprising. Conservatives tend to go through life in a permanent state of confusion.
It's sayign things liek this that reinforces the Reality that peopel tend to be tribalist, nd tend to see peopel of ricval Tribes not as simply diffeent, but somehwo inferior or Evil.
Conservatives, of coruse, arent really going through Life perpetually confused, you just rpefer this caricature as it invalidates them as people. -
nabors76 — 10 years ago(December 03, 2015 10:36 AM)
That is, at best, a gross over simplification and, at worst, yet another shining example of the inadequacies of the public education system and the mass non-education/indoctrination it commits. The First Amendment was written to prevent a FEDERALLY Sponsored Church, not to completely separate politics and religion. In fact, many US states had state religions or required their citizens to be a member of a church. This ended around 1833 when Taxachussetts shut down their established church. The "wall of separation" was an invention pulled out of the butt of the lunatic Earl Warren; his penumbra of pabulum. But, pretending for a moment that anything he said made sense and jelled with a sane person's logic, there is no prohibition what so ever against a person mixing religion and politics. Members of the Church of Hypocritical Left Wing Frakking Nut Cases do it every time they vote.
House and Gibbs are my role models!!! -
ZAROVE — 10 years ago(November 05, 2015 04:25 AM)
DrSamba -
and you can also put the blind followers of obama in there buddha. im sure you just forgot.
That's just stupid.
Why? He has a valid pointt. But I think you just want to bash Relgiion and use this as soem fault nly Relgiion has, when in Reality its a fault we ee in other areas. -
jbaker1-2 — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 04:17 AM)
…and you can also put the blind followers of obama in there buddha. im sure you just forgot.
<sigh> Give a right-winger the slightest chance to show the world how ****ing stupid he is and he'll take it. Every single time.
There are 8.2 billion people in the world. 8.19 billion of them have never heard of and don't give a fuck about Charlie Kirk. Get over it. -
zeta1983-1 — 16 years ago(February 01, 2010 07:21 PM)
In my experience most Science Fiction writers are not friendly to religion and vice versa. Science is based on questioning and investigation, religion on believing without evidence. Science & religion aren't always incompatible but in most cases are not good bedfellows.
-
walter907 — 12 years ago(September 10, 2013 08:44 PM)
Read more science fiction. Or study more religion. There are many religious scientists and I've seen science fiction which includes religion positively (Orson Scott Card, Firefly). But most science fiction just doesn't dwell on religion one way or the other unless its required for the story.
-
ZAROVE — 10 years ago(November 05, 2015 03:47 AM)
zeta1983-1 -
This post is bunk, base don a poor understandign of the topic. Mainly it relies on arguments famous Atheists ;ike Richard Dawkisn made, rather than on objective analyisis.
In my experience most Science Fiction writers are not friendly to religion and vice versa.
In y expeirnce, most peopel who are Hostiel to Relgiion, and see themselves as not Religious, are fooling themselves. They hve their own form fo Religion, they just don't cal it that.
I'd also like to pointout two things. Sience Fiction Writers aren't always Scientists, or even usually so, and the fact that most Sci Fi Writers aren't actually hostile to "Relgiion". Soem are, or were, but not all or most. Many "Religious people" also enjoy Sci Fi.
Science is based on questioning and investigation, religion on believing without evidence.
No, Religion is not based on beleif without evidence. If you think you can prove it is by sayign Relgiion is "based on Faith", and then define Faith as beleif withut evidnece, you prove my earlier point. Faith isn't beleif without vidence, its simply another word for Trust. Religion is not base don anything. Religion is a blanket term used to descibe ones beleifs about he nature and meangn fo our exitence, and doens't delve into how one arrives at said beleifs. One can eaisly base ones Religion on Sicntific INvwstigation.
Science & religion aren't always incompatible but in most cases are not good bedfellows.
his is sheer nonsense. The idea that Sicence and Relgiion have any problems at al only goes bakc to the 19th Cntiry, and has been debuned since he 1950's. -
jbaker1-2 — 1 year ago(October 16, 2024 04:19 AM)
Son, I hate to be the one to break this to you, but you're completely full of ****.
There are 8.2 billion people in the world. 8.19 billion of them have never heard of and don't give a fuck about Charlie Kirk. Get over it.