Nudity in the movie?
-
ali-104 — 20 years ago(April 19, 2005 02:27 AM)
So the blatant nudity is disturbing but the blatant stylistic violence and killing is acceptable? Whateverthere is sex in the film but little actual nudity apart from a pair of mammary glands on show about 3/4 of the way in.
You should watch Urotsukidoji or something along those lines -
SirGii — 20 years ago(February 08, 2006 03:01 PM)
There isn't as much nudity in the movie as there is in the anime series, in the anime, nearly every main character is running around naked from some point on, which i thought, wasn't disturbing, but more like a soft porn, than like an action anime.
The movie contains some sexual/nudity scenes, but it's kinda o.k. it's not as pointless as it is in the original series, where freeman fights a half naked chick, while he is (half) naked himself almost every episode. -
Tirkka — 17 years ago(May 27, 2008 01:17 PM)
It would be sad if someone skipped this movie just because of the nudity. There is some, but not much at all. Only a couple of scenes. Basically you just see Marc Dacascos' ass and Yko Shimada's breasts (not in the same scene), that's all.
"Losers always whine about their best. Winners go home and beep the prom queen."
-John Mason -
karym6 — 17 years ago(January 27, 2009 11:03 AM)
The nudity is the anime is prodigious - I could never really figure out why, other than you get to see Freemans tattoo.
Essentially, all the way through the anime, Freeman, his freinds and his foes are pretty much naked all the way through. The sex is over the top, and probably in the west we dont really get the point.
I dont think it would have gone down well in a Hollywood version of the anime.
Dont forget that Freeman is the morally and sexually ambiguous leader of a Chinese/Japanese crime syndicate that seems to make the bulk of its money from the sale of illegal drugs So perhaps the idea of nudity when compared to these facts dont really mean that much.