So Utterly Disappointing…
-
Jim Shortz — 3 years ago(July 18, 2022 10:07 PM)
I think this one suffers a lot from its generic location. New York City is featured in so many thrillers and action movies to the point were it's lost a lot of its luster. The first two Die Hard films benefitted tremendously from their novel locations of being set in an office building and an airport.
Agreed 100%.
The skyscraper & airport are some of the more original settings for an action film.
That's why I dig Under Siege, got a great setting like Die Hard. -
-
Jim Shortz — 3 years ago(July 18, 2022 09:59 PM)
I don't mind DHWAV but the McClane character works better by himself rather than with a sidekick. Die Hard 1 & 2 compliment each other well while the third feels different, very 90s. The woman who slices up the fat cop is the worst character in the die hard series.
-



— 3 years ago(July 18, 2022 10:24 PM)I DON'T know WHY so MANY prefer this OVER
Die HARD 2
?? Makes NO SENSE to me! My guess is that they are
NOT
TRUE ACTION flick fans. IF you are a TRUE action film buff, then one and two are SUPERIOR to three.
“Call a SPADE, a SPADE; and a TRANNY, a TRANNY, or an IT!!!”.
"THAT'S SOME BAD
SHIT
,
HARRY
!".
] — 3 years ago(July 18, 2022 12:49 PM)
you're the dumb one. the misspelling is intentional, ya staggit.