Underrated

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Die Hard with a Vengeance

---

manifoldsixth — 10 years ago(December 25, 2015 12:19 AM)

In my opinion, this film is much better than even original Die Hard which is currently 8.2 rated. And mostly thanks to outstanding performance by S.L.Jackson and Jeremy Irons.
It surely deserves a 8.

[fgadmin]

ShallowAl69 — 10 years ago(January 11, 2016 06:49 AM)

it surely deserves an 8
At least!

[fgadmin]

wallacesawyer — 10 years ago(January 16, 2016 01:09 PM)

It's alright. Not as good as the first two, but better than the next two. I didn't care that much for Jackson, as he brings up too much racial crap.
http://www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/

[fgadmin]

ewansp-2 — 10 years ago(January 24, 2016 03:05 PM)

Definitely better than 2!

[fgadmin]

HonestRef7745 — 10 years ago(March 24, 2016 09:43 AM)

This is the best die hard movie

[fgadmin]

aboyes1989 — 9 years ago(April 06, 2016 07:47 PM)

Die Hard is technically the best of the series. Very unique and ahead of it's time. But DH: With a Vengeance is my favourite. I love the pairing of McClane and Zeus, Jeremy Irons as Simon Gruber and the size and scope of the film.

[fgadmin]

fjk1138-731-161881 — 9 years ago(January 17, 2017 06:57 AM)

I've always loved this movie because of the interplay between Bruce and Sam J, the villain is arguably more morally ambiguous, and the whole city is at stake vs a building or an airport.