Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. John Malkovich miscast

John Malkovich miscast

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
28 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #14

    IMDb User

    This message has been deleted.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #15

      Catdubh — 14 years ago(April 10, 2011 01:08 PM)

      How many Italian guys from Jersey do you know who are named Ellery Coolidge?
      You make a good point but in reply, Ellery Coolidge was a name, and not definitive of the character. While Chazz is a well known East Coast, Italian American actor, the fact that I did not associate the character Ellery Coolidge, with any ethnicity, is more indicative of Chazz's versatile acting ability, IMHO.
      Perhaps other viewers, such as you, immediately associated Chazz as miscast as
      Ellery because he is a well known Italian American actor but I did not make that association.
      Jack's not dead! Jack would never die without telling me, first!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #16

        IMDb User

        This message has been deleted.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #17

          degree7 — 14 years ago(August 24, 2011 11:50 PM)

          and Jennifer Connelly was only there for eye candy.
          I'm pretty sure her character was there for a lot more reasons than that. Were you even paying attention?
          And to the OP, I disagree, Malkovich's monologue about atoms when he and Nolte's character first meet is great!
          And Malkovich was already 43 during the production of this film.
          I said I never had much use for one.never said I didn't know how to use it.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            IMDb User

            This message has been deleted.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #19

              degree7 — 14 years ago(August 25, 2011 10:58 PM)

              So they could have put some butterface in her role then, but how would that make sense to the story?
              Obviously a woman like her would have to have been a fairly decent knock-out bombshell to attract the attention of both a high-ranking general and a married member of the hat-squad.
              But I get what you're saying, Jennifer Connelly put in a bad performance. In which case you are CLUELESS, just look at that primal look in her eyes when she and Nolte first meet, there's a certain talent there that not just any yahoo could pull off.
              She appears in all of, what, two brief scenes, and for her to be able to shadow those snippets of her character and transpose that over the rest of the film, she would have had to have been a good actress.
              I said I never had much use for one.never said I didn't know how to use it.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                IMDb User

                This message has been deleted.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21

                  degree7 — 14 years ago(August 26, 2011 01:59 PM)

                  Gee, I'm sorry, I thought this was a BOARD for FILM DISCUSSION.
                  I said I never had much use for one.never said I didn't know how to use it.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #22

                    IMDb User

                    This message has been deleted.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #23

                      degree7 — 14 years ago(August 27, 2011 01:27 PM)

                      She did a 10x better job than Kim Basinger in LA Confidential, who basically stood around looking pretty.
                      Jennifer Connelly had about two lines in the script, and managed to outdo old Kim.
                      Anyway, they couldn't have gone with any old pornstar, because certain actors and actresses have something called star presence, and Ms. Connelly has that in spades in this film.
                      I said I never had much use for one.never said I didn't know how to use it.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #24

                        movies789 — 9 years ago(April 22, 2016 05:59 PM)

                        Catdubh You say your great-uncle was - a general? In his early twenties? In WWII? Aaaaah, no - I'm just not buying it. In the Civil War, sure; WWII, no. If you'll name him, I'd like to look him up on google or Wikipedia; surely a WWII general in his early twenties would be there. He'd have to have been a renowned public figure, so privacy shouldn't be an issue. If your claim is provable, I'll edit this post and eat my words right here, for all the world to see. Still, I wish him well, whatever his rank and age at the time.
                        former Army officer

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #25

                          Kieselguhr — 14 years ago(March 26, 2012 10:43 PM)

                          Malkovich was trying to be a cross between General Groves and J. Robert Oppenheimer. He was neither.
                          Bruce Dern looked like he was trying to be Harry Truman, and a not-very-convincing one at that.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #26

                            jones7418 — 13 years ago(August 24, 2012 09:13 PM)

                            I think Melanie Griffith was miscast; way too young for the part. Really, they want us to think a gorgeous young blonde like her would marry a man who looks like the Blair Witch at age 75? Someone a little closer to Nolte's age would've been more believable. MG did a good job, she was just not old enough.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #27

                              Zuider_Zee — 12 years ago(June 17, 2013 05:03 PM)

                              There was no sense of the military about his portrayal. He was horrible in the role and was a definite miscast.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #28

                                Edward_de_Vere — 9 years ago(May 31, 2016 12:28 PM)

                                First of all,he didn't at all act militarily to me
                                I thought the same thing at first.
                                However, it's likely that the character had an unorthodox military career, perhaps as a nuclear scientist who became a commissioned officer in the Army and was mostly involved in the Army's nuclear research program from then on. So perhaps it's fitting that in spite of his rank he seemed more like a stereotypical scientist than a stereotypical Army General.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0

                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • Users
                                • Groups