Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. and not necessarily for being "enjoyably bad." They also agree that Jon Voight deserves a Best Supporting Actor nominat

and not necessarily for being "enjoyably bad." They also agree that Jon Voight deserves a Best Supporting Actor nominat

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
13 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    nothingbutflowers — 15 years ago(June 23, 2010 11:38 PM)

    OH MY GOD that was amazing!!!!
    Hah i love watching old S + E reviews and this one just blows my mind. i thought you were joking before I watched it. They seriously contemplate him being worthy of an oscar nod. WTFFFF they were smoking crack in the green room that day apparently.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      kaiser100 — 11 years ago(August 10, 2014 04:41 PM)

      And yet, amusingly, the film has attained so-bad-its-good cult status. What the hell Jon Voight was doing in it, howeverlol

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        yihdzelonh — 9 years ago(October 03, 2016 05:10 AM)

        This is the movie that Jon Voight was born to star in. This was his pre-destined 'calling card.' Forget his role as the Pope. Forget his Oscar-worthy role as a disgruntled Mormon bishop in "September Dawn." This is the role that cemented Voight's incomparable legacy: The muscular/hulking Paraguayan pony-tailed snake catcher villainous SOG with a one million percent bona fide South American accent.
        Nor has anyone -BEFORE OR SINCE- pulled off such an amazing acting performance -even if it was in a 'villainous' role

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          TheFriendlySniper — 15 years ago(July 09, 2010 01:39 PM)

          Hahaha that was pretty cool. This movie is one of my guilty pleasures.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            a_l_i_e_n — 12 years ago(June 16, 2013 12:02 AM)

            Ebert later told Richard Roeper how good he thought Voight was in this film. Roeper looked at him with a mixture of amazement and confusion and replied "I don't know what you're talking about!"

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              parknourie — 9 years ago(January 14, 2017 04:04 PM)

              Do you have a link to that? Or even just what review they were discussing at the time when he referenced that?
              I love watching Roger Ebert and I came to know him too late.
              Thumbs Up, Thumbs Down and a Wagging Finger of Shame

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                a_l_i_e_n — 9 years ago(January 14, 2017 04:12 PM)

                Just from memory. And if I recall correctly, Roger suggested Jon Voight's performance was worthy of an Oscar nomination. Roeper wasn't inclined to agree.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  Randy-144 — 12 years ago(January 11, 2014 12:00 AM)

                  Not only did Roger give it 2 thumbs up but he gave it 3 and 1/2 stars. But then he gave 4 stars to quite a lot of movies.
                  http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/anaconda-1997

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    IMDb User

                    This message has been deleted.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      Balboasaurus — 10 years ago(September 03, 2015 06:18 PM)

                      I came to the sad realization that Ebert was a mere mortal when he praised this movie, and yet gave a bad review to The Mummy. This is terrible.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        parknourie — 9 years ago(January 14, 2017 04:03 PM)

                        "There is within me an unslaked hunger for preposterous adventure movies. I resist the bad ones, but when a "Congo" or an "Anaconda" comes along, my heart leaps up and I cave in. "The Mummy" is a movie like that. There is hardly a thing I can say in its favor, except that I was cheered by nearly every minute of it. I cannot argue for the script, the direction, the acting or even the mummy, but I can say that I was not bored and sometimes I was unreasonably pleased. There is a little immaturity stuck away in the crannies of even the most judicious of us, and we should treasure it."
                        This is a quote from Roger Ebert's review of The Mummy (1999).
                        3 stars out of 4. That's still a thumb up (with the guest reviewer at the time giving it a thumb up as well, it was a two thumbs up movie).
                        So I don't know what you're talking about when you say he gave a bad review.
                        As for the sequel to The Mummy, well, it wasn't as good as the first.
                        If I remember correctly, Roger Ebert even liked the third Mummy (although that one's quite universally hated).
                        Thumbs Up, Thumbs Down and a Wagging Finger of Shame

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          parknourie — 9 years ago(January 14, 2017 04:07 PM)

                          I'm bummed.
                          The link's broken and the page doesn't work anymore.
                          If anyone could provide the link to the old video, you'd be saving a life!
                          I'd love to see this particular episode
                          Thumbs Up, Thumbs Down and a Wagging Finger of Shame

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups