Why was de Niro here?

[fgadmin]

DoctorShemp — 9 years ago(July 10, 2016 10:40 PM)

That's precisely why it's such a great role for him, because it's so un-DeNiro. The character and his performance are so beta that i almost forget it's him. Which is what makes it cool

[fgadmin]

enriquesinghjr — 9 years ago(August 03, 2016 05:04 PM)

When I saw him in this movie I always thought that the reason why he appeared in this movie was because he wanted to work with Tarantino since it was his follow up film to Pulp Fiction

[fgadmin]

striker90210 — 9 years ago(August 06, 2016 04:29 PM)

Of all the actors they could have chosen to play such small unimportant role, they chose de Niro. He does a good job. But come on, it's beep de Niro!
This is an old interview with Tarantino. The same question was asked and here is his answer. It starts at 12:50 minutes. First the age of the character. Second, a different role that is not about cool dialogue but it is about body language.
"This is a mission, not a fancy dress ball !!"

[fgadmin]

ClassicMacGruber — 9 years ago(August 08, 2016 04:40 AM)

Because it's a physical performance.

[fgadmin]

dhmason6155 — 9 years ago(August 12, 2016 11:52 AM)

He seems to take anything that's offered to him (Rocky and Bullwinkle?!) basically out of boredom, although he also plays mild mannered beta-males (What Just Happened, Mad Dog and Glory, The Intern) as well as powerful alpha males (Goodfellas). Maybe he's seeking some kind of balance.
We got a job.
What kind?
The Forever Kind.

[fgadmin]

DracTarashV — 9 years ago(August 15, 2016 09:45 PM)

His sex scene with Fonda is a masterpiece, and that's all that matters.
Jokes aside, De Niro is in this movie because he actually wanted the role of Max Cherry but Tarantino already had Robert Forster in mind for that role, so De Niro ended up with a smaller but no less memorable part. His casting as Louis was perfection.
You want something corny? You got it!

[fgadmin]

dhmason6155 — 9 years ago(September 10, 2016 01:56 PM)

De Niro and Samuel Jackson were the most exciting actors, and the standouts in an otherwise marginal movie. This is regarded as one of Tarantino's weaker films.
I think this is the only movie that Tarantino didn't write and it showed. It's obvious to me that he had a hard time interpreting a book, and hence a different set of influences and ideas than his own.
But his "Guns and Babes" sales video was awesome!
We got a job.
What kind?
The Forever Kind.

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

BarksdaleBaratheon — 9 years ago(January 16, 2017 09:32 PM)

Acting has nothing to do with the amount of dialogue an actor has. Watch it again and take a look at his body language. That alone is a master class in acting.

[fgadmin]

vittimafia — 9 years ago(January 17, 2017 01:45 AM)

He's fantastic in this! So funny and pathetic being out of his element everywhere
That was real? I saw that movie, I thought it was bullsh*t

[fgadmin]

bubblegum_jenocide — 9 years ago(January 30, 2017 07:33 PM)

Yeah, they chose De Niro, but that doesn't mean they forced De Niro. He obviously agreed to do the part. He must have seen some merit in it.

Pidder Padder? Make my Heart go Boom Bap and Then We'll Talk!