Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Johnny Depp's Most Haunting Performance

Johnny Depp's Most Haunting Performance

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
14 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — From Hell


    NiKoDay — 12 years ago(July 30, 2013 11:28 PM)

    I don't know that I can say that his performance in "From Hell," a fairly stylish but mediocre hollywood film, is better than say, Edward or Captain Jack, but it is his most compelling, complex, serious, subtle, and troubled. I've seen this film a couple times over the years, and while I find it numbingly dull in parts, something about J.D.'s performance here is really compelling. Depp really seems to be channeling something here deep within, a pain and addiction without parody, hyperbole or hiding behind masks. He seems nakedly tortured, as if he's a part of a different movie, a darker movie, a rawer movie, a better movie than the one going on around him.. The character is claravoyant, extremely gifted, beautiful, passive, troubled, touched by greatness and not wanting it, and, wella drug addict. His drug is absinthe, opiates, tobaccoDepp seems to know this man, his pain, and his momentary release from that pain. It may seem stylish, but underneath it's ugly and painful. With great artistry, he nails those feelings. It's not a performance that's ever talked about, lost among his wilder more eccentric characters, but in its subtlety and openness it may be his best.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Sauvage_98 — 12 years ago(November 27, 2013 02:15 AM)

      Not sure if it's even one of his best performances but I agree with you that it's a compelling, complex, serious and subtle performance.
      "Tell yourself whatever you need to hear, you're the only one listening."

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        willsgb — 11 years ago(September 12, 2014 08:31 PM)

        I agree wholeheartedly. I just watched this film again, and to be honest, I don't understand why it gets written off by so many people; it's got a lot of tension, character and intrigue, and above all it is carried by strong performances, particular depp's. just the way he talks to people, the stare in his eyes, his focus when investigating, and his passion and rage in his most urgent and angry moments, are outstanding. he does the accent well too I thought, and just painted a really broad and vivid picture of the character he was portraying.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          leBratPrincess — 11 years ago(September 26, 2014 09:08 AM)

          Its the subject matter, most people can't and don't want to admit stark reality. I personally thought this was a masterpiece film, Depp nailed it. Whether it was all that factually correct or not - it should have been more. Aside from the I love this film.


          http://anothersiteinla.weebly.com/

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            bear022013-588-696101 — 10 years ago(May 19, 2015 12:49 PM)

            Best film in fifty years.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              IcingOnTheCake — 11 years ago(January 07, 2015 09:11 PM)

              It was one of the few movies in which he seemed to be playing a real person than a surreal character. It's more of my personal preference than his usual work.
              I liked this character.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                bear022013-588-696101 — 10 years ago(May 19, 2015 12:50 PM)

                Agreed!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  BoultersCanary — 10 years ago(May 21, 2015 11:00 AM)

                  WHAT
                  real person? It sure as hell wasn't Fred Abberline.
                  The church may shout but Darwin roars

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    stitchesaresore — 10 years ago(July 18, 2015 12:57 AM)

                    And this (correct) response shows why Depp doesn't get enough recognition for this role. He certainly wasn't playing a historically accurate character in a historically accurate film. However he was playing exactly the person that the script called for and he did blow that out of the park. With Depp's recent track record its sometimes hard to remember just how vast his skill is.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      puirt-a-beul — 10 years ago(July 26, 2015 12:03 AM)

                      Not the historical one, no. But I never thought the film was trying to be anything but a fantasy riff on the real-life events; it didn't seem to me to be pretending to be history.
                      And I think Depp did a great job of creating a credible character within a Gothic horror context.
                      You might very well think that. I couldn't possibly comment.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        IMDb User

                        This message has been deleted.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          puirt-a-beul — 10 years ago(July 25, 2015 11:58 PM)

                          Well put, Icing. I agree completely.
                          You might very well think that. I couldn't possibly comment.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            bear022013-588-696101 — 10 years ago(May 19, 2015 12:48 PM)

                            This film is without peer.The entire film and every character has/have given all that they possessed.
                            To dismiss or criticize this work of art is nonsense.
                            Depp,Coltrane.all of them.best effort and end product in last thirty years or more..

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              puirt-a-beul — 10 years ago(March 22, 2016 12:24 AM)

                              I love the film, but "work of art" is maybe a
                              little
                              too strong.
                              And most of the cast was great, but I do think Heather Graham fell a little short of the general standard.
                              You might very well think that. I couldn't possibly comment.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0

                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Groups