This movie SUPPORTS the death penalty.
-
Captain_Beeble — 9 years ago(September 20, 2016 03:59 PM)
Arlen Bitterbuck wasn't a rapist, but he got the death sentence as well. But in the book there were some characters that got their time commuted to life sentences. That poses the question, how come some prisons have the death penalty for murderers, and others don't? Another argument I've often heard in favor of the death penalty is it saves money on having to feed, clothe and shelter the convicted murderers.
-
IceboxMovies — 9 years ago(September 21, 2016 01:21 AM)
Another argument I've often heard in favor of the death penalty is it saves money on having to feed, clothe and shelter the convicted murderers.
Of course, there's also the argument that the death penalty itself is a waste of money! -
Mr_Recchia — 9 years ago(September 26, 2016 03:30 PM)
Do you think the movie advocates John's views and choices? Especially since he's portrayed as a naive, simple minded manchild? Michael Clark Duncan's acting coach told him, flat out, "your character is five." He got that from reading the script. Certainly we shouldn't take the spontaneous actions of a child seriously. Paul in his old age also refers to John as a "force of nature," meaning many of his choices aren't fallible, but that he can't necessarily be blamed for them.
John's actions are random and impulsive, and the movie knows it. It's not trying to use him as a thesis for its themes.
Officially Canadian for 27 years. Never heard "aboot." -
KingCobra686 — 9 years ago(September 26, 2016 04:48 PM)
I would say the opposite. The only characters who died through the chair were shown dying in emotional scenes that made you feel bad for them. If the movie was pro-death penalty I would have expected more villains dying in the chair to show how effective and important it was.
When
Percy kills Wild Bill
, I think that is also in support of the death penalty. It was a pointless move by Percy because Wild Bill was doomed anyway, and the fact that Percy doomed himself by making a rash decision like that is supportive of the more organized structure of the electric chair process. It also was certainly not portrayed as justice. -
IceboxMovies — 9 years ago(September 26, 2016 05:32 PM)
When , I think that is also in support of the death penalty.
Did you mean to say "against"?
It was a pointless move by Percy because Wild Bill was doomed anyway, and the fact that Percy doomed himself by making a rash decision like that is supportive of the more organized structure of the electric chair process. It also was certainly not portrayed as justice.
It may have been pointless of John to make Percy pull the trigger. But I bet audiences felt pleased to see Wild Bill get it. Admittedly, I sure did. -
Citation_Needed — 9 years ago(January 08, 2017 01:13 AM)
Good! We need to kill more criminals and broken people. They don't appreciate what life offers and are a negative influence on society, who ruin other people's lives. No different than putting down viscous or unwanted dogs.
I'm so in favor of the death penalty, I think if any innocent person gets killed from it, the prosecutor should get the death penalty. They won't even get a trial. Just a hearing where they have to prove the innocent man who died was guilty and when they fail, they get executed. That will teach them to flaunt that power recklessly to try and force a plea or confession without the proper evidence. The only way they can survive is if they show that new evidence was presented and why they didn't find that evidence in the first place. -
AnthonySocksss — 3 years ago(September 19, 2022 05:46 PM)
Death penalty is a violation of human rights and also doesn't solve anything and just creates more suffering and death of innocent people
Melton1 Wanted for Pedophilia:
https://i.ibb.co/6cnPmJVr/IMG-0830.jpg
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/Zjxk307CND0 -
ToastedCheese — 3 years ago(September 20, 2022 07:12 AM)
Like Delacroix comments, for Coffey to look after Mr. Jingles until this "foolishment" be done. It might give an outlet for the victims families to feel some relief, but as depicted in the film, many were just ignorant rednecks and thrive on the biblical OT eye for an eye mentality.
It doesn't solve the inherent issues of violent crime in society, by using state sanctioned killing as a crutch to infer killing is wrong.
Norman! What did you put in my tea? -
holatKolnoa — 1 year ago(December 20, 2024 10:16 AM)
"many were just ignorant rednecks who thrive on the biblical eye-for-an-eye mentality." - I know. I kept asking myself, "Who are these people who come to view the execution?" They were self-righteous ignoramuses who got validation for their ignorance by watching the executions. I mean, the women dressed up, for God's sakes, like it was a party.
When you think of garbage, think of Hakeem!
Folks, calm down! This is not the last chopper outta Saigon!
