Right Bare with me here.
-
The_Monocled_Mutineer — 12 years ago(September 15, 2013 04:46 PM)
No, I never said that he was a Pervert.
So, why didn't he just lay his hands on Hal's wife, it would have been far less intrusive and a lot less alarming.
I still think it's a torrid continuity error. -
doug65oh — 12 years ago(September 15, 2013 09:59 PM)
No, there's no continuity problem at all. In every instance but one (leaving aside Percy's infection with the tumor, which is directly opposed to Paul's healing so should be obvious) Coffey had direct access to those he healed or sought to heal - the girls, Mr. Jingles, Melinda, and so on. The method employed varied according to the situation.
-
The_Monocled_Mutineer — 12 years ago(December 20, 2013 02:37 AM)
Erm. No I don't.
Please re-read, but this time, maybe I don't know, read it properly, without the superiority complex, you "Movie Fan".
I'll grow up when you get off your high horse. For it's a long, long way down. -
holatKolnoa — 1 year ago(December 20, 2024 02:47 PM)
Nope, ridge, not unnecessary at all. I see exactly where the OP's coming from. There was a touch of eroticism there, but I wouldn't call it perversion.
When you think of garbage, think of Hakeem!
Folks, calm down! This is not the last chopper outta Saigon!