Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Ivanka and Barack will be neighbors!

Ivanka and Barack will be neighbors!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
50 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #36

    yobets — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 07:48 AM)

    We survived Billy Carter, I think the Republic will survive this too.
    What does Billy Carter have to do with this? He was Jimmy's brother, not his child. Billy did not move to D.C. He did not sit in on Jimmy's meetings with important people only to get a big loan from them. He was not running Jimmy's business that was put in a blind trust.
    You really can't see the difference or the conflict of interest having Ivanka helping her father?????

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #37

      !!!deleted!!! (28128673) — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 09:14 AM)

      Billy Carter had NOTHING to do with Jimmy Carter's presidency. What an ignorant analogy.
      No one is saying that a President must be an only child with no siblings. The point is, relatives aren't elected by the people to have ANYTHING to do with running the government.
      First ladies have had a traditional sphere of influence. . .and hopefully some men will one day soon have that traditional influence as well.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #38

        pvd295 — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 09:55 AM)

        No one is saying that a President must be an only child with no siblings. The point is, relatives aren't elected by the people to have ANYTHING to do with running the government.
        President reagan had four adult children - Maureen was heavily involved in California politics and public issues. She didn't move into the WH, nor did she move to Washington, DC. None of his adult children had any part of meetings, or his decisions - though his wife did.
        So why should Trump and his kids be so active in his administration?
        "Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #39

          !!!deleted!!! (28128673) — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 10:05 AM)

          pvd, I'm starting to think that Trump realizes NO ONE likes him. There are people who fear him, don't trust him, kiss his arse, but NO ONE likes him or thinks well of him. The only people who truly care about him are his family, so they're the only people he is comfortable having around him.
          Whenever Ivanka sits in on a meeting, we need to SPEAK OUT. Whenever one of his sons or his son-in-law acts in an advisory capacity, we need to SPEAK OUT.
          And, yes, I'll continue to speak out whenever one of his cruel, idiot sons murders an innocent animal and poses with its deceased body as a trophy. Such a fair fight when one of the combatants is shooting, no? Deplorable, truly deplorable. That has nothing to do with government, but everything to do with being a humane being.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #40

            A_l_a_c_h_u_a_1 — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 06:19 PM)

            And, yes, I'll continue to speak out whenever one of his cruel, idiot sons murders an innocent animal and poses with its deceased body as a trophy. Such a fair fight when one of the combatants is shooting, no? Deplorable, truly deplorable. That has nothing to do with government, but everything to do with being a humane being.
            Hey hester, why aren't you speaking out about what those cruel, idiot monsters did to that innocent mentally disabled young man on the Facebook live stream? How deplorable did you think
            that
            was? Where is your outrage over that? Why isn't
            that
            "truly deplorable"? Don't you also think that that has nothing to do with government, but everything to do with being a humane being? What's your response to
            that
            , hester?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #41

              pvd295 — 9 years ago(January 06, 2017 05:36 AM)

              The only people who truly care about him are his family, so they're the only people he is comfortable having around him.
              And even that support is limited. Melania is staying in another state not to be with him, making the occasional 'photo appearances' when absolutely necessary (Christmas Eve and New Years Eve); Tiffany is usually not in the picture; and his 2 sons haven't exactly moved to DC.
              It's really his daughter/mistress Ivanka who is always around him, running the show and getting involved. I guess she is his sole beneficiary in his will?
              "Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #42

                yobets — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 06:10 PM)

                but is it ILLEGAL?
                It may be. After JFK picked his brother for AG, Congress passed an federal anti-nepotism law. This would also include Trump's son-in-law.
                "A public official may not appoint, employ, promote, advance, or advocate for appointment, employment, promotion, or advancement, in or to a civilian position in the agency in which he is serving or over which he exercises jurisdiction or control any individual who is a relative of the public official."

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #43

                  zabbree — 9 years ago(January 04, 2017 05:04 PM)

                  That's the hypocrisy of partisan politics, but you seem to be the only one on the "right" that sees that point.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #44

                    tmontyb — 9 years ago(January 04, 2017 06:06 PM)

                    Yes. If the reverse were true, the right would be doing exactly what you and others are doing on here.
                    Aren't you supposedly Canadian? WTF, are you doing on this thread? Nevermind
                    It takes a sick mind for someone to keep replying to your posts when you said they're on ignore.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #45

                      A_l_a_c_h_u_a_1 — 9 years ago(January 04, 2017 06:17 PM)

                      Aren't you supposedly Canadian? WTF, are you doing on this thread? Nevermind
                      Aren't you yourself supposed to be in Canada right now? Along with your pals hester and pvd? WTF are you doing on this thread? Nevermind.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #46

                        tmontyb — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 01:38 AM)

                        Aren't you yourself supposed to be in Canada right now? Along with your pals hester and pvd? WTF are you doing on this thread? Nevermind.
                        Oh shut up. You know you're mrbean. Nice try though.
                        Plus, what does Hester or PVD have to do with my post? Oh yeah, that's right they said they have you on ignore and your little mind can't take it.
                        Too bad so sad for you
                        It takes a sick mind for someone to keep replying to your posts when you said they're on ignore.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #47

                          mrbean-87852 — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 04:46 AM)

                          I am mrbean. Nobody else on this board is me. I have as much right to be on this board as anyone. Just because you can't formulate any kind of credible argument doesn't give you the right to accuse people of being a sock puppet. Grow up!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #48

                            tmontyb — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 07:28 AM)

                            I am mrbean. Nobody else on this board is me. I have as much right to be on this board as anyone. Just because you can't formulate any kind of credible argument doesn't give you the right to accuse people of being a sock puppet. Grow up!
                            Sure, sure.
                            It takes a sick mind for someone to keep replying to your posts when you said they're on ignore.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #49

                              mrbean-87852 — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 08:21 AM)

                              You are delusional.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #50

                                tmontyb — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 08:30 AM)

                                You are delusional.
                                Ironic coming from you, but whatever makes you feel better.
                                It takes a sick mind for someone to keep replying to your posts when you said they're on ignore.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0

                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • Users
                                • Groups