Airline passenger berates Ivanka Trump and her family
-
anbmom — 9 years ago(December 25, 2016 02:25 PM)
The Clintons don't walk around telling you how rich they are and lying about their monetary worth. With Trump it is always "I'm the richest, smartest, etc, etc." The Clintons may throw a lavish wedding a or wear expensive clothes but they don't wear them with the price tags showing like the Trumps do. AND, the Clintons didn't gold plate everything in their home.
-
JamesAvalon — 9 years ago(December 25, 2016 03:57 PM)
The Clintons don't walk around telling you how rich they are and lying about their monetary worth. With Trump it is always "I'm the richest, smartest, etc, etc." The Clintons may throw a lavish wedding a or wear expensive clothes but they don't wear them with the price tags showing like the Trumps do. AND, the Clintons didn't gold plate everything in their home.
Yeah, I don't think the Clintons want to advertise their net worth. It just raises suspicions. How the HELL did they make so much money on speeches? What exactly were they promising in return? And you will notice their speaking fees have gone down substantially? Gee, I wonder why. -
!!!deleted!!! (28128673) — 9 years ago(December 28, 2016 10:20 AM)
That photo of the Trumps in their obscenely lavish living room, Barron sitting on a large stuffed lion, is disgusting. Coal miners will be looking at it wondering, when's he going to keep his promise to us?
-
fab4_gal — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 10:42 AM)
She's pretending to be one of the ordinary people.
I was just going to say that anbmom
My guess is that she wants to give off the impression that they're really all just
ordinary folk
"You're going to need a bigger boat" -
!!!deleted!!! (28128673) — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 11:21 AM)
Later reports indicate that the passenger did not confront Ivanka. He was distraught that she was on the flight and was holding his own son when he made the comments. He should not have spoken aloud, absolutely, but initial reports that he accosted Ivanka are incorrect.
-
pvd295 — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 11:33 AM)
Exactly - he was speaking in a conversational tone. SO far the only ones who heard him are the ones in the row in front of Ivanka, and the ones seated in the row behind her - no one else. He was exercising his freedom of speech, and he was 'deplaned'. She signaled for her security and they took it from there.
I'm sure if he was addressing anyone else on the plane that way, he would have been allowed to stay.
"Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16 -
pjpurple-1 — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 11:51 AM)
If that makes you happy to think that and not lose your Hilary lovin' mind, so be it.
Cabin crews are able to remove passengers who are disrupting a flight or are perceived to be dangerous, sorry if you don't get that!!! But if some eeeevil Trump supporter yelled at Chelsea Clinton for flying commercial and "pretending to be one of the ordinary folks" , you folks would be having emotional meltdowns,calling for a Congressional hearing and retaliation.(and probably blaming the KKK too) You are so sadly transparent. So silly, so comical,
so sad!
Facts are not liberals strong suit. Rhetoric is. Thomas Sowell -
pvd295 — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 11:58 AM)
Cabin crews are able to remove passengers who are disrupting a flight or are perceived to be dangerous, sorry if you don't get that!!!
The only person who saw this as disruptive and perceived to be dangerous was Ivanka, and no one else - because this man was voicing his opinion and exercising his 1st Amendment right, which really ripped her a new one. Poor Ivanka.
But if some eeeevil Trump supporter yelled at Chelsea Clinton for flying commercial and "pretending to be one of the ordinary folks" , you folks would be having emotional meltdowns,calling for a Congressional hearing and retaliation.(and probably blaming the KKK too) You are so sadly transparent. So silly, so comical, so sad!
Yes, but this man was not yelling at Ivanka - that has been determined. And we have no idea who he supported in the election. And if we called for a Congressional hearing, we would be ignored by the Republicans who have control.
So you're idiocy is just that - idiotic.
"Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16 -
tmontyb — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 02:13 PM)
But if some eeeevil Trump supporter yelled at Chelsea Clinton for flying commercial and "pretending to be one of the ordinary folks" , you folks would be having emotional meltdowns,calling for a Congressional hearing and retaliation.(and probably blaming the KKK too)
Another hypothetical that has zero basis.
You are so sadly transparent. So silly, so comical, so sad!
#potcallingkettle
I hope you have great Christmas.
It takes a sick mind for someone to keep replying to your posts when you said they're on ignore. -
pvd295 — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 08:17 PM)
Poor PJ&PIMPLES. She tries so hard to sound intelligent - she really does!
But she always trips and falls, saying something completely baseless and idiotic, and ends up in the back of the class, with the other kids wearing a 'dunce cap'. So every now and then, let's turn to her from in front of the class and 'wave hello' so she doesn't feel completely left out. OK? Let that be our New Year's Resolution.
"Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16 -
Dengal — 9 years ago(January 03, 2017 04:44 PM)
I do. The woman flipping out in Michael's believed she was being treated differently from the cashier because they had different skin colors and therefore the cashier was intolerant of her view. Therefore, she had a melt-down.
Cashier was intolerant, what? Ok, even going by your example that isn't intolerance of a view, and more specific to this, political viewpoint. Let me explain the difference for you pvd
Thinking someone is out to get you for no logical reason/evidence because of your race, religion, sex, sex pref, who you voted for, who you back, ect, is just a perceived persecution complex/disorder. AKA Mental issues/crazy
Being against someone because of his/her race, religion, sex, sex pref, who you voted for, who you back, ect is not being tolerant of other views. AKA intolerant.
So a republican/conservative (if that) screaming about being discriminated against because they voted Trump and/or are white isn't the same as a liberal screaming (if that happened)who voted Trump or in this case is a Trump. -
pjpurple-1 — 9 years ago(December 25, 2016 06:39 PM)
Oh hi there, pee with the V.D.!! Hope you had a nice Christmas! I'm sure SOMEBODY cares about you, as long as you keep your pie hole shut and don't try to "sound intelligent" and talk politics!!
But exactly HOW would YOU know if someone was "trying to sound intelligent"? You actually have to BE intelligent to differentiate the smart from the dumb! And we all know which category you fall into. Hint: It's the one that's the most familiar with the dunce cap.
Merry Christmas and looking forward to a fun filled New Year of exchanges. You provide me with so much amusement. You really do. Not being sarcastic, you are, heaven help me, starting to grow on me. You're a treasure!!
Facts are not liberals strong suit. Rhetoric is. Thomas Sowell -
pvd295 — 9 years ago(December 25, 2016 07:19 PM)
Maybe after the holiday you could admit that if Chelsea Clinton flew commercial ( a stretch of the imagination, I admit,LOL) with her kids and someone yelled at her, either Hester or pvd would break a leg running to their laptops to post "how evil and awful" some right winger was to yell at her.
Possiblybut if someone addressed her in a conversational tone like this guy did to Ivanka, we wouldn't. So what's your point? Oh that's right - you don't have one. Again.
"Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16