Just when conservatives can't be any more foolish….
-
kittensandpuppies — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 09:58 PM)
What goes around comes around, buddy.
"All liberal colleges becoming less tolerant of conservatives" - definitely true however, most colleges are/teach liberalism and ARE/have been INTOLERANT of conservatives. That's the truth. -
pvd295 — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 06:18 AM)
Defeating the corrupt Clinton machine and ridding ourselves of the likes of that inept Obama were the greatest accomplishments of 2016. But seeing the biased media deflated to the paparazzi of print and seeing the continuous whining of liberals is, and is going to be for 4 years, the icing on the cake. This is going to be better than anything comedy central can do. Oh yeah, liberals, just four words for you. Conservative Supreme Court Judges.
Still, zero response on why an innocent man on the plane should be fired from his job for observing his husband for exercising his First Amendment rights.
"All liberal colleges becoming less tolerant of conservatives" - definitely true however, most colleges are/teach liberalism and ARE/have been INTOLERANT of conservatives. That's the truth.
So why should this professor be fired from his job, just for observing his husband exercising his right to freedom of speech? You're still not answering the question, either.
"Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16 -
tmontyb — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 07:53 AM)
You're still not answering the question, either.
LOL, did you really expect an answer that made sense or an answer at all?
It takes a sick mind for someone to keep replying to your posts when you said they're on ignore. -
kittensandpuppies — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 08:30 AM)
Him being fired from his job is the liberal way of thinking so I thought you'd get that. Had someone harassed and insulted the Obama girls on a plane about their dad, there would be heck to pay.
Just another sore loser. -
pvd295 — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 09:31 AM)
Him being fired from his job is the liberal way of thinking so I thought you'd get that. Had someone harassed and insulted the Obama girls on a plane about their dad, there would be heck to pay.
For years, we've been accused of defending the First Amendment - you know, that pesky little thing Trump wants to abolish? Now you're saying if it was Obama's kids, we wouldn't be defending the FA? Geez - make up your minds!
BTW, the Obama girls are not 35 year old business women, married and raising three kids like Ivanka. So your analogy is way off, once again.
"Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16 -
JamesAvalon — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 09:58 AM)
For years, we've been accused of defending the First Amendment - you know, that pesky little thing Trump wants to abolish?
A lie but even if he wanted to, there is no way he could.
Obama, on the other hand, GLOATED about being able to bypass the legislative branch and, without authority, altered laws to fit his needs dozens of times.
Have you ever criticized Obama for constantly abusing, and exceeding, his authority? -
kittensandpuppies — 9 years ago(December 31, 2016 01:59 PM)
BTW, the Obama girls are not 35 year old business women, married and raising three kids like Ivanka.
Oh is that the rules? I didn't know if they're a certain age it's ok to harass!
Ok
P
er
V
erte
D
! -
pjpurple-1 — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 10:27 AM)
Good posts gang!
But I did get a kick out of pvd's comment about "that pesky little thing" called the first Amendment. At first I thought he was referring to himself as a "pesky little thing. LOL
If someone had harassed the Obama girls in the same way, I'd find it just as terrible. But face it, will they ever be flying coach again? LOL Of course the criteria for harassment ARE different according to pvd. The Obama daughters are NOT 35 year old business women like Ivanka Trump. So apparenty it IS okay to verbally assault adult women, but only if their daddy is a Republican.
If you want to watch the left's verbal assaults and crazy metdowns in full force, watch some of Milo Yiannopolis on youtube. He just finished up his college lecture tour for 2016, The Dangerous beep Tour. I am NOT making this up!! That's what HE calls it.
I just watched his speech at West Virginia University. There were shouts, protests, offensive signs. I thought the left abhorred "hate speech." When none of their disruptions worked, the little twits pulled the fire alarm. At every University he has spoken at there's always some numb nut group screaming and trying to shut him down.
It's such irony coming from the crybabies who "feared and trembled" at the way gays would be treated under a Trump regime. Well, I suppose if you are a gay man who is a conservative, you CAN be harassed and threatened and shouted at. Milo takes it all in stride and calls his harassers "darling". He's a trip.
The left is going totally bonkers. I say, let them show their true colors. Bring all this out into the light. Sunlight is a great disinfectant. It kills vampires too.
P.S- I just see that the name for the Dangerous $#^^&% Tour got "censored"well so much for free speech!!! And pvd was so WORRIED about Trump If a gay man can call HIMSELF that and call his tour that, why is everyone else offended?? Hint: It rhymes with hag! It's also a slang word for a cigarette in England. Sheeesh!! The snowflakes are falling fast. LOL
Facts are not liberals strong suit. Rhetoric is. Thomas Sowell -
kittensandpuppies — 9 years ago(December 31, 2016 02:02 PM)
This man has uncontrollable tendencies and should not have a platform, under the guise of education, to recklessly indoctrinate the next generation.
Now this is what bothers me. Having the perverted in education! -
Dagwoodie — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 12:06 PM)
Maybe Mr. Bradley should review the First Amendment?
Maybe you should post the whole story, instead of cherry-picking those parts of it that Lasner nothing but a victim.
Lasner joyously tweeted that his "husband" was at the airport, and rushing to get the opportunity to harass Trump's daughter and grandchildren.
Of course, he has since courageously deleted that tweet, and probably even his entire account. My, what brave souls you SJW's are!
Also:
Lasner posted a photo of a college student wearing an old Reagan / Bush shirt earlier this year without the young man's knowledge and then wrote:
'Seeing this walking out of @packercollegiate this morning made seriously ill. It's disgusting that teenagers might find this amusing. As far as I'm concerned it's hate speech. #idontheartthe80s'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4059082/Ivanka-Trump-aggressively-confronted-man-JetBlue-sitting-children-screams-father-ruining-country-asks-flight.html#ixzz4ULw5wXIo
Finally - he has every right to spout off and show what a spoiled little fool he is. But if an employer or institution should determine that his speech and conduct, however constitutionally protected, has become harmful or an embarrassment to it by association, then it has every right to sever that relationship. Just as the University of Missouri eventually did, although not nearly soon enough to save its own ass, when it kicked reprehensible Melissa Click to the curb.