All White Rockette Line-up for Trump
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The View
!!!deleted!!! (28128673) — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 12:27 PM)
More details regarding the dancers who don't want to perform at the inauguration of Herr Trump. Although they're not being "forced" to dance, many fear losing their jobs and will dance so under duress. Also, not a single woman of color has signed up to perform. Not surprising since Trump ran the most bigoted campaign since George Wallace.
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/12/disgruntled-rockette-hits-back-at-being-forced-to-perform-for-this-monster-trump-at-inauguration/
All the little turds down on Breitbart Street love to hear the Donald goin' tweet, tweet, tweet. -
tmontyb — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 01:17 PM)
Among other things, Mary said that one of her fellow dancers broke down crying after learning that shed have to dance for Trump because she felt she was being forced to perform for this monster against her will.
Reading that, it sounds awfully dramatic, but I guess I can empathize.
It takes a sick mind for someone to keep replying to your posts when you said they're on ignore. -
pjpurple-1 — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 02:37 PM)
Hey James, do you ever listen to Ben Shapiro? He talked about a 'Rockette' the other day who was so upset at being "forced" to perform at the Inauguration.
He said that the left FINALLY realizes that a person should not be FORCED to serve someone with whom they disagree. Designers don't want to make dresses for Melania. Singers don't want to perform for Trump. All well and good. But this concept of "freedom" of working for whom you choose did not occur to leftards when they insisted that Christian bakers make cakes for gay weddings.
You have the right to deny service to anyone you want, as long as you are denying it to a CONSERVATIVE!, a CHRISTIAN, etc. But if it's a member of the LGBTQSRT, angry lesbian, sad little leftard community, you BETTER do what they want! Or ELSE you are a bigot!
Facts are not liberals strong suit. Rhetoric is. Thomas Sowell -
yobets — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 03:45 PM)
The bakery is not the victim here. They CHOSE not to follow the anti-discrimination laws & paid the consequences. Unless some of the Rockettes & others, who do not want to participate, say it's because they don't like orange people, it's not discrimination. There is no law that says you have to participate in the inauguration when asked - no laws were broken. You're comparing apples & oranges - I'm not surprised.
-
!!!deleted!!! (28128673) — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 03:53 PM)
The bakery situation was about the EQUALITY guaranteed by our constitution.
The Rockettes' situation is about women having to perform in front of a sexual predator, Trump.
You're right, yobets, apples and oranges. -
!!!deleted!!! (28128673) — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 04:39 PM)
Trump won't be getting the A-list dancers of the group:
http://www.spin.com/2016/12/rockettes-job-inauguration-donald-trump/
All the little turds down on Breitbart Street love to hear the Donald goin' tweet, tweet, tweet. -
pjpurple-1 — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 06:19 PM)
NO, the bakery chose to follow the dictates of its own conscience! CONSCIENCE- Something the left has trouble understanding OR following! The government cannot force people to go against their religious beliefs no matter how many stupid laws it tries to pass.
"Orange" people? Stop being such a horse's ASS!!
What is WRONG with peope OF COLOR?
Did I SAY that the Rockettes who didn't want to dance should be FIRED? NO I DIDN'T. If they want to sit this one out, fine with me. I couldn't care less. They should not be fired or penalized in any way if it hurts their snowflake feelings to perform. Who gives a sh#T? Not I!
My point was that they are SO VERY offended and don't want to perform. So don't! Stay home. But the left is VERY UPSET that someone be forced to do something against the dictates of his/her conscience. Sothe baker should lose his livelihood, but a "pissant crybaby with a PMS attack" dancer should be excused??? Live with hypocrisy. If you can live with Hillary, you can live with anything, I guess!!! OKAY!
The sad thing is, you think you make sense!!
s
Facts are not liberals strong suit. Rhetoric is. Thomas Sowell -
yobets — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 07:08 PM)
Anti-discriminatory laws are stupid???? Maybe to you - not to me.
I don't remember Ted Nugent or Kid Rock volunteering to sing at Obama's inauguration.
What are 'snowflake feelings'?
They are offended & are staying home. I doubt they care if you give a sh*t or not. The only person being a "pissant crybaby" about this subject is you.
Just another passage you must have missed -
Matthew 7:5
You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother's eye. -
JamesAvalon — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 06:35 PM)
As a free country, they have the right to refuse service to anyone they want, which is what all private business should have, and I should know because I have worked in many privately owned businesses who did refuse service to people from time to time. This is not a government institution but rather a PRIVATE BUSINESS. The fact that you think we should FORCE businesses to serve ANYONE, regardless of the situation, proves you are way too far gone on this LGBT issue. The LGBT community SELECTED this bakery to get this attention and go after ANY business who refused them.
Yet again proof you liberals are much more like Nazis than you would ever admit. Would you also force a Muslim business to go against their religious beliefs? Never. You don't have anywhere NEAR the courage to do that. You treat Muslims like you do the LGBT community, like little children who need to be constantly coddled. -
pvd295 — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 06:16 PM)
He said that the left FINALLY realizes that a person should not be FORCED to serve someone with whom they disagree. Designers don't want to make dresses for Melania. Singers don't want to perform for Trump. All well and good. But this concept of "freedom" of working for whom you choose did not occur to leftards when they insisted that Christian bakers make cakes for gay weddings.
Wow - you really need a public education if you think the two situations are even remotely the same. That Catholic education failed you miserably - sue the Catholic schools you went to, and show them how you can't comprehend differences in two situations.
"Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16 -
pjpurple-1 — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 06:57 PM)
Well, okey dokey, pvd you think you are SO smart, educate me on the difference!
People should not be forced to serve a client with whom they do not want to do business with, regardless of the reason.
It's okay with you, in fact you are THRILLED (as one can glean from your retardo childish posts) that designers won't dress Melania, singers won't perform at the Inauguration,etc. But a Christian won't bake for some Sodomites and that KILLS you!
Should A Muslim restaurant be forced to make BLT sandwiches for a church group who is having a picnic?
What is wrong with you? Why are acting like such an incoherent A@@? Why do you keep on insulting my "Catholic education"? Envy? Stupidity? Did mommy and daddy pull you out of private school because it was a waste of their hard earned $$ to try and educate a low I.Q. fool like you?
Facts are not liberals strong suit. Rhetoric is. Thomas Sowell -
yobets — 9 years ago(December 27, 2016 07:21 PM)
"Should A Muslim restaurant be forced to make BLT sandwiches for a church group who is having a picnic?"
Again, not the same thing. You're lousy at analogies. No one asked the baker to make something that wasn't on his menu or something that they weren't offering others. If a Muslim restaurant refused to serve Jews or Christians, yes they would be forced to - it's the law.
You're insulted by PVD bringing up your Catholicism, but have no problem questioning PVD's faith. I guess you don't see the hypocrisy. -
pvd295 — 9 years ago(December 28, 2016 06:49 AM)
People should not be forced to serve a client with whom they do not want to do business with, regardless of the reason.
So a born-again Christian who owns a bakery does not have to serve a Jewish person who stops in to buy a loaf of bread because they disagree with their religious beliefs?
A misogynist who owns a bakery can refuse service to a female customer who stops in to buy an apple pie because she's a woman?
A 55 year old who owns a bakery can refuse service to bake a wedding cake to a 20 year old couple because he feels their too young to get married?
A black cafe owner can refuse to serve a white man a cup of coffee because he doesn't like white people?
ARE YOU INSANE? Is this what your Catholic education taught you? Is this what you have gained from Christianity? I think you need to replace your 'moral compass'.
It's okay with you, in fact you are THRILLED (as one can glean from your retardo childish posts) that designers won't dress Melania, singers won't perform at the Inauguration,etc. But a Christian won't bake for some Sodomites and that KILLS you!
You really don't get it, do you?? You really don't understand the difference do you?
Should A Muslim restaurant be forced to make BLT sandwiches for a church group who is having a picnic?
If they already have BLT sandwiches on their menu - YES. If they don't offer BLT sandwiches on their menu, then NO.
What is wrong with you? Why are acting like such an incoherent A@@? Why do you keep on insulting my "Catholic education"? Envy? Stupidity? Did mommy and daddy pull you out of private school because it was a waste of their hard earned $$ to try and educate a low I.Q. fool like you?
Just trying to make sense of nonsense post, that's all. And can't believe you proudly tout your Catholic education when they have obviously failed you so miserably.
"Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16 -
tmontyb — 9 years ago(December 28, 2016 07:35 AM)
Just trying to make sense of nonsense post, that's all. And can't believe you proudly tout your Catholic education when they have obviously failed you so miserably.
I've said before that her posts were dogmatic, but in a way that they don't make sense.
It takes a sick mind for someone to keep replying to your posts when you said they're on ignore. -
pvd295 — 9 years ago(December 28, 2016 07:52 AM)
I've said before that her posts were dogmatic, but in a way that they don't make sense.
Believe me, I know. She doesn't understand the whole "posting" method in which you can read through your post before you hit 'send'. She's too busy typing every nonsensical idea that pops into her head and randomly inserting emojis then to actually proof-read what she's posting.
"Splodey heads keep splodin' " - Sarah Palin, 7-1-16 -
pjpurple-1 — 9 years ago(December 28, 2016 10:31 AM)
Once again you demonstrate your ignorance by ASS-uming you know what another poster is thinking.
Yes, I agree that a person shoud "read through" a post. In fact if YOU had actually done that in your latest post, you would have known it was "than to actually proofread"(it is one word, NOT hyphenated) and not "THEN to actually proof-read". emoji aert!!!
I do admit that I am at fault for trying to engage LEFTtards in intelligent discussions. You clearly have your closed little, scared minds made up!! No emojijust you're dumb!!
Experience trumps brilliance. Thomas Sowell -
!!!deleted!!! (28128673) — 9 years ago(December 28, 2016 10:02 AM)
I applaud you on all points, pvd, and I went to Catholic elementary school. I'm no longer a practicing Catholic (I don't adhere to a single organized religion; I feel closest in spirit to Unitarianism because there's no dogma) but it's clear the Pope would not condone such intolerance. When people use religion to condemn others, the religion has failed them.