Could a teacher REALLY get fired…
-
transmentalist — 18 years ago(March 22, 2008 01:36 AM)
Something no one's mentioned yet, although it may be irrelevant, is that the incident got picked up by news outlets nationwide. That helped blow his misdeed out of the water. Then again, he quit before it became big news.
-
Xapora — 16 years ago(October 23, 2009 06:05 AM)
Something no one's mentioned yet, although it may be irrelevant, is that the incident got picked up by news outlets nationwide
That's not irrelevant at all! Good call. And they did make a point in the movie to show all of the newspaper articles etc.
There would've been too much pressure put on the school - it was better for everyone if he just quietly slipped away before the media descended on "small town America" to cover the "scandal".
Hell is other people - Sartre -
HumanFundRecipient — 17 years ago(April 28, 2008 03:28 PM)
A paralegal for the biggest law firm in the city.
I'm just guessing, but I think Tracy would have represented by one of those lawyers if her mom was a paralegal.
I'm open! There's just nothing in there! -
falcon2484 — 16 years ago(July 13, 2009 01:03 AM)
Anyway, what mistake did he make? He put them in the trash.
Best thing to do is to pocket it and take it home and burn it!
Or throw them in the toilet and pee on them. That's what I would've done.
The Falcon flies -
hodie — 12 years ago(May 25, 2013 06:28 PM)
I doubt thay Mrs Flick's position as a paralegal would have made any difference. The case itself wasn't a moneymaker, and that is pretty much all that matters.
Tracy was either delusional or bluffing.
"Joey, have you ever been in a Turkish prison?" -
Doc80 — 12 years ago(June 18, 2013 04:17 AM)
Exactly right. No lawyer in their right mind would ever take that case. Considering that she was a straight A student and all the extra curricular activities she was involved in, the fact that she lost an election for student body president wouldn't have affected her chances of getting into pretty much any school she wanted.
I would also like to point out, like the people above you did, that him throwing away the votes was pretty stupid. He should have either pocketed them or, and this is what I would have done, changed one vote for Tracy into a vote for Paul. Just cross it the mark and put another one next to Paul's name. It's a better idea than pocketing it too because it keeps the number of votes the same and could easily explain why the kid had a different count. -
Copyright1991 — 17 years ago(July 29, 2008 06:08 AM)
Well, remember, Tracy's mother was a paralegal at the city's biggest law firms. So, if he didn't either leave or get fired, the school would probably get sued. but i love how the stuff with the janitor all came around. That guy kinda reminded me of Milton on Office Space.
"I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that."
-HAL 9000 -
rmiikku — 13 years ago(July 19, 2012 03:16 PM)
There are no grounds for a case and even if there was Tracys mother cannot sue over some frivolous high school disputes. When Tracy threatens Jim with legal action earlier on that scene is just to point out what a colossal pussy Jim is. If you are afraid of empty treats you are worthless.
-
pinkchi — 17 years ago(September 19, 2008 10:17 PM)
I don't think it's a trivial thing to sabotage a student election! Of course the whole thing is funny in the movie, and we are on his side a little, but in real life a teacher would not have integrity if he or she did that. Not only is he biased against a student, one of the worst things a teacher could be, to rig the election is pretty low and he's abusing his authority. Even if he didn't get fired, he would lose the respect of many people.
-
Jorge_Dunst — 17 years ago(October 19, 2008 11:08 PM)
just look at her angry face, she was going to beat McAllister up
Make The Dark Knight #1 in the top 250
imdb.com/title/tt0468569 -
sErpEnt_v — 16 years ago(August 27, 2009 05:37 AM)
it sounds silly, but he was afraid of being discovered right then and there - by the two students who were in the room with him.
Remember how it was shown that he very slowly and carefully moves his hand to the stack, quietly takes two, then coughs to hide the noise while he crumples and drops them ..
While technically it wouldnt have been impossible for him, to put them in his pocket instead, I believe it would have required a more obvious movement of his arm, and would also have caused more noise.
Throwing them in the garbage can was the quickest and quietest method available to him at the time.
His real mistake here was that he never came back to remove the evidence afterwards
As for the posters who are arguing that a teacher should be fired for doing what Mr M. did in the movie, because he would have shown himself to be untrustworthy or biased: I agree with you, BUT I also believe that teachers are human, and I would be very surprised if not every single one of them sometimes felt the way and acted the way Mr. M. did, (i.e. failed someone simply out of spite, or let someone slide out of sympathy, or similar).
I don't know, Butchie, instead.