Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Billy would certainly have mentioned to Sidney at the end of Scream, that she had a brother from a different father. As

Billy would certainly have mentioned to Sidney at the end of Scream, that she had a brother from a different father. As

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
19 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #5

    coastin_on_a_dream — 10 years ago(April 19, 2015 01:17 AM)

    Well, he couldn't have done that, because it wasn't his idea. Scream 3 was written by Ehren Krueger.
    Actually, most of the movie was Kevin Williamson's idea. He even wrote a 35 page outline for Scream 3. However, he had an extremely busy schedule writing for Dawson's Creek and couldn't find the time to write the actual script. So the studio hired Ehren Krueger to write it, and Ehren followed Kevin's outline. Ehren wrote the actual script, but the ideas were all Kevin's.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #6

      InTheHub — 10 years ago(September 03, 2015 02:34 AM)

      the ideas were all Kevin's
      Sorry but no. The identity and motive of the killer in Scream 3 was all Ehren Krueger/Wes Craven.
      Kevin Williamson originally had a cult of killers that was being masterminded by Stu(from Scream) from prison.
      The studio rejected his draft and went with other writers, hence the falling out between Kevin and Miramax.
      Same thing happened years later on Scream 4, they hired Krueger to re-write and add a lot of scenes to Kevin's finished script for Scream 4.
      "See it with someone you loveGo by yourself"

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #7

        tub51461 — 10 years ago(November 02, 2015 08:43 AM)

        As far as the Stu angle, it's definitely for the best. Setting aside the electrocution, there's no way his psychotic brain could survive a 500 lb. TV landing on it. I'm surprised they showed his body shaking unless they wanted us to assume that he may had been brain dead, but his body didn't die yet and heart was still pulsing.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #8

          daiotyhgh984 — 10 years ago(November 05, 2015 05:05 AM)

          Sorry but no. It was always Williamson plan for end of trilogy to revealed Sidney brother, who will be Michael Myers for her Laurie Strode. He was just wasn't movie director, as Stab 3 director survived in his treatment.
          And killers in treatment wasn't cult, it was school Stab fan club led by school director's daughter.
          Studio considered Stu being killer only after they rejected Williamson story, people misinterpreted Lillard words about Scream 3 and writed this wrong information in trivia.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #9

            Movie_Buff_Brad — 10 years ago(November 08, 2015 06:34 AM)

            And killers in treatment wasn't cult, it was school Stab fan club led by school director's daughter.
            I still don't see where Sidney's half-brother fits in. Where are you getting your information?
            http://www.dorkly.com/post/73323/5-star-wars-prequel-complaints-the-internet-needs-to-retire

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #10

              Housefan2 — 11 years ago(February 26, 2015 09:44 AM)

              It's possible Roman didn't mention his identity to Billy. It wasn't really necessary to tell him that information. He showed Billy the footage of Billy's father meeting and carrying on a secret affair with Maureen and that was enough to set him off and decide to kill her.
              In his reveal, Billy never mentions how he found out about Maureen and his father. He just tells Sidney that her mother was having an affair with his father and that's why his mother abandoned him.
              I wasn't a huge fan of the lost brother twist but I'll give them credit for not contradicting what happened in the past. You're right, though, it is a stretch.
              Lizzie
              To love another person is to see the face of God! - Les Miserables

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #11

                IMDb User

                This message has been deleted.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12

                  Geeky Randy — 10 years ago(September 04, 2015 09:45 PM)

                  by
                  Housefan2
                  Thu Feb 26 2015 09:44:59
                  IMDb member since February 2005
                  It's possible Roman didn't mention his identity to Billy.
                  ^ This is what I always assumed. Roman being Sidney's brother had nothing to do with why Billy wanted Maureen dead. If Roman was as clever as he was developed to be, we could assume he never told Billy he was Sidney's brother, therefore leaving Billy without a need to mention anything to Sidney.
                  Book:
                  http://geeksteronmovies.blogspot.com/p/the-geekster-guide.html
                  Votes: 3,520

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13

                    FifthElement85 — 10 years ago(April 08, 2015 01:22 PM)

                    I don't knowI thought the lost brother angle worked perfectly. And, SHOULD HAVE, ended the series.
                    I mean, who else at that point could have had it out for Sidneybesides maybe Cotton Weary for falsely identifying him? That may have been too hokey, though.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14

                      adventure-mode — 10 years ago(June 07, 2015 12:49 PM)

                      I don't think Roman mentioned he was Sidney's brother to Billy. In the end of Scream 3 he says he showed Billy the footage of Maureen and his father, and seeing him not very happy about it, gave him a few tips and pointers, like to get a partner in case he got caught and etc.
                      Roman also specifically says that he "had no idea they were gonna make a film of their own". I'm guessing Roman planted the seed but had no part in the whole orchestration of the thing.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #15

                        Neptunechild87 — 10 years ago(August 31, 2015 06:13 PM)

                        Ok maybe Roman didnt tell Billy his identity. But what DID he tell him?? What would his reason be for caring about Maureen Prescott's affair? There is no way Billy wouldnt have asked "Who are you"? Of course Roman couldve told him a lie but it wouldve been nice to know what LIE he told Billy. And honestly I think Billy wouldve repeated the lie to Sidney whether Roman told him to keep it quiet or not. Billy was gonna kill Sidney anyway so who would she even tell??

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #16

                          Axle_Starr — 10 years ago(August 31, 2015 09:00 PM)

                          I honestly don't find it unbelievable to think that Billy just simply didn't mention Roman to Sidney. The Woodsboro Murders were strictly Billy's (and maybe Stu's) vision; it'd be one thing if it was Maureen's murder that the movie was about and Billy failed to mention Roman's role
                          I'll take a potato chipand
                          EAT IT!!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #17

                            Man-In-Black08 — 10 years ago(March 07, 2016 08:31 PM)

                            There's no reason to believe Roman ever told Billy who he really was. Roman was not after Sid at the time, only Maureen. Telling Billy he was following her because she rejected him and he was the product of rape was not only irrelevant to Roman's plan, but Billy wouldn't have cared to anyway.
                            Sure he probably asked 'who are you?' but Roman could easily come up with some lie that he was following his own dad around to catch him cheating on his mother and hates Maureen for being such a man-stealing, house-wrecking slut. That actually makes more sense than him explaining his whole backstory.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #18

                              bull-boy — 1 year ago(June 03, 2024 05:56 PM)

                              Agreed 👍

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #19

                                Fun Guy From Yuggoth — 1 year ago(June 03, 2024 06:04 PM)

                                This whole movie was lame. The worst of all of them, even the new ones.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0

                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • Users
                                • Groups