5.5?! Ridiculous
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Scream 3
nikgnorge — 9 years ago(January 12, 2017 01:19 AM)
After 17 years, Scream 3 remains as much a classic as the first two films in the series. Scream 4 was terrible and not needed but there is no reason for this one to be rated so low.
-
ShallowAl69 — 9 years ago(January 12, 2017 01:54 AM)
I agree.
Perhaps the whole brother plot is why the rating is so low?
It could be Courteney Cox. Her hair. Her scream.
It also could be Jenny McCarthy.
Or the lack of Kevin Williamson.
Or the toning down of the explicit gore of the first two films.
And, as much as I like her, it could be Parker Posey's overacting. -
Angelus-16 — 9 years ago(January 18, 2017 11:06 AM)
Blame the women much!?
Upping the comedy at the expense of horror - that's a problem. Blame that on the idiots who shot up Columbine.
The main actors looking tired of going through the motions - that's a problem.
Ehren Kruger writing script pages once filming had already started, resulting in bad dialogue and characters splitting up and making stupid decisions - that's a problem.
Courteney Cox's hair and yellow pantsuit is a problem. Patrick Dempsey's dull-as cop too. The entire 'it's a trilogy' thing when the alternate endings for Scream 2 prove anything but.
The whole production looks rushed and like obligatory. It's a 7 at most.