Does anyone agree that this is probably the most underrated British horror ever. It deserves to be given more credit tha

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Terror

---

stu-250 — 18 years ago(December 14, 2007 03:15 PM)

Does anyone agree that this is probably the most underrated British horror ever. It deserves to be given more credit than it has, the film is fast paced, gory, exciting, but has suffered because people continuously compare it to or even accuse it of being a rip-off of Argento's Suspiria (1977). It may have been inspired by certain elements of Suspiria, like the use of colours, but Terror unlike Suspiria has an understandable plot with characters you can associate with.

[fgadmin]

ash24m — 15 years ago(December 12, 2010 02:41 PM)

It's not in the same league as Suspiria but I do agree it's very underrated.

[fgadmin]

Hey_Sweden — 14 years ago(February 12, 2012 10:25 AM)

I don't know about MOST underrated, but I do quite like it. I definitely agree with your points.
What do you think this is, a signature? It's a way of life!

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

Woodyanders — 12 years ago(January 30, 2014 04:39 AM)

I thought this film was a lot of good'n'gruesome fun.
I'm a totally bitchin' bio writer from Mars!

[fgadmin]

ElectricWarlock — 9 years ago(August 19, 2016 08:23 AM)

It wasn't bad at all. Other than a few creative death scenes and the film being about a witch, the film doesn't have much in common with Suspiria. I don't see why there are all the comparisons. Anyways, while Suspiria is better this film is still kind of good. I give it a 7/10.