Elizabeth Perkin's made alot better Wilma! Kristen Johnston make a horrible Wilma but as for Jane Krakowski i think she
-
arucard_nob — 19 years ago(April 25, 2006 08:10 PM)
Jane Krakowski as Betty is sexy and has very good body. And in it completes scene, in which all dance, noticed that him side his baggy trousers.
On Kristen Johnston, the good that it good tapeworm is that tapeworm pirnas and was pretty. -
xtrmfury — 19 years ago(September 11, 2006 05:39 PM)
her acting was fine, but the look , which is obviously important, was off.she was too tall and her voice was too low. if this movie was original and not based off a popular cartoon, then it would have worked. but we
-
conchord_phan — 19 years ago(November 22, 2006 07:49 PM)
auh - i couldn't stand her as wilma - she would have made a better one if she tweaked her voice up a bit.
Treat each day as if it were the last day of your life. Please be a child sponser for World Vision. -
ecavuto — 13 years ago(July 20, 2012 10:27 AM)
Yes, I'm with you. The sequel Wilma looks nothing like the cartoon. In fact only Betty was cast well. Steve Baldwin as Barney is plain screwy, although he captures the character's dopiness. It was obvious to me that he's much taller than the actor playing Fred! I wish Goodman would have returned as Fred. He really did well in the first.
-
batmanjokercatwoman — 17 years ago(April 04, 2009 02:53 AM)
Elizabeth Perkins definately matched the Wilma look. As for her performance, although she's a good actress, she didn't interest me. Kristen Johnston although she didn't look or sound the part, I think she did a good job.
Jane Krakowski was definately way better than Rosie O'Donnell, not just for looks but for performance aswell. Jane's Betty laugh was perfect. In case you can't tell I hated O'Donnell's Betty.
