I prefer Jurassic Park III over Jurassic World.
-
Captain_Wesker — 9 years ago(June 07, 2016 04:47 AM)
Jurassic World tried too hard to wink at the fans with it's constant (trite) attempts at cleverness. It feels more like a parody/satire of Jurassic Park than a genuine sequel.
It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing
. -
Sigh_Moon — 9 years ago(June 05, 2016 03:44 PM)
I absolutely agree.
This movie feels real because of real locations and clever editing blending animatronics with CGI. JW just shows cgi dinosaurs and buildings without any attempt at camouflaging the fakeness of it.
JP 3 also depicts dinosaurs as real animals while JW depicts them as brainless monsters (mosasaur, indominus rex) or humanizes them way too much (nodding raptor).
Oh, and JP3 had way better characters. -
Captain_Wesker — 9 years ago(June 07, 2016 04:50 AM)
People complain that the Spinosaurus was over-the-top, but what it actually did during it's brief screen time is
NOTHING
compared to the B-movie antics of I-Phone Rex.
It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing
. -
Captain_Wesker — 9 years ago(June 08, 2016 05:16 AM)
Additionally, it's dogged pursuit after the main characters is also logical.
Remember that the plane injured the Spinosaurus enough to make it bleed (note the blood on the windshield after the nose scrapes by the sail of the creature). The humans emerging from the wrecked portion of the aircraft could be perceived as the vehicle's "offspring" that could one day also pose a threat to it.
It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing
. -
ToddManning — 9 years ago(June 09, 2016 01:46 PM)
Absolutely. The plane scene is a beautiful example. That is exactly how a dog or cat would try to get his food out of a metal tube. Animal behavior, not monster behavior.
That was cringe worthy to read.
Rest in peace Judith Barsi
St.Louis Rams
Go Ducks, UO