should I watch or not?
-
Save_A_Lemming — 21 years ago(January 18, 2005 04:50 PM)
I'm seconding abba's glowing endorsement: This film is poo. Literally. Like celluloid excrement. Abba, I'm glad you mention that Tony Todd thought it was crap because I was so dissappointed that he had anything to do with it. At least I can see that he still might have some semblance of taste. Bimbo descendant kills him by destroying his paintings. That. Was. Stupid. I don't see how destroying the few pieces of evidence that this was once a good man would destroy him. Terrible terrible idea. And yes, I'm aware that I just spoiled the ending of the movie. Don't be mad, I just saved you a headache and many years of therapy. The only way a 4th movie could possible work is if Candyman becomes the pure incarnate of evil since there's no longer any evidence of him ever being a human. And I mean really evil. It would have to begin with him very gleefully and slowly pulling the flesh from the bones of the bimbo heroine and just get worse from there. And now I gotta shut up, this is hurting my head.
It has everything! Dinos! Space! More Dinos! A Fantastical Delectable Array of Cinema-sweeping Musical Numbers the likes of which you have never even imagined! -
mstubbs38 — 21 years ago(February 28, 2005 01:47 PM)
I gotta say that this movie sucked!!! don't get me wrong but i am a big fan of the candyman, and this movie had potential - the ideas there but what upset me was simply the continuity! They completly changed the way he became The candyman, they should at least stay true to the previous films, thats what really bugs me about films
-
horrorsifi — 19 years ago(December 14, 2006 02:18 PM)
candyman=a good worthwhile movie
candyman:farewell to the flesh=entertainig
candyman 3:day of the dead=abomination of a movie, a sad attempt to recreate the first
Dont Bother it SUCKED (compared to the first)