This message has been deleted.
-
theromanempire-1 — 19 years ago(November 20, 2006 02:31 PM)
No dude. This was the worst candyman ever. Nothing to do with the first two flicks. Different story which sucked a big time. Watch again candyman 1 and 2 and then watch this beep and tell me what the f u ck has to do with the others in terms of plot continuity.
-
BrianCTyler — 18 years ago(September 10, 2007 12:37 PM)
How does 2 lack continuity with the first film? It makes perfect sense to me. Maybe because Candyman is back when he appeared to die in the first film? I think it was because his legend was still alive.
3 doesn't make sense. Why would Annie call Candyman again if she already put an end to him and saved herself? It just didn't make any sense. -
Dixie_84 — 18 years ago(September 27, 2007 07:52 PM)
His outfit was changed and he had a different hook. What, was the other one off at the dry cleaners and the hook was off getting polished?
This movie has no continuity to the second whatsoever. It's so irritating. I honestly think it has to be the worst film ever made, and I don't just mean horror. Out of every movie i've seen, in every genre, which is a bloody lot (so to speak, LOL) this really does have to be the worst. What was Tony Todd thinking?
A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle!