How is Trumps illegal war against public broadcasting going?
-
CoffeeMugShot — 10 months ago(May 27, 2025 07:00 PM)
There was no public broadcasting back when The Constitution was written so things change.
Taking away their funding is the same as violating their free speech rights.
In his EO Trump even pointed out things he did not like what they were covering.
This is just a move from a control freak who is butt hurt over things he cannot control and wants to get his way.
What harm is there in the government funding public broadcasting which is peanuts in comparison to other things they pay money for?
If you don’t watch it to begin with then why do you support their free press rights being violated? -
Yermom_Is_God — 10 months ago(May 27, 2025 08:56 PM)
Taking away their funding is the same as violating their free speech rights.
No it isn't. Free speech protects you from the government, it doesn't include government funding. Obviously. If it did every media organization would be demanding tax payer funding.
What harm is there in the government funding public broadcasting which is peanuts in comparison to other things they pay money for?
When the government funds it the government can easily manipulate it. NPR has 84 editors, all 84 of them are registered Democrats. Not one single registered Republican. It has turned into another Democrat tool. This is the reason you want it tax payer funded. Personally I don't give a **** what their political bias and agenda is, tax payer money should not be going to any media organization, left or right.
If you don’t watch it to begin with then why do you support their free press rights being violated?
Free press rights don't include government funding. You're still having trouble with this.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
CoffeeMugShot — 10 months ago(May 27, 2025 12:53 AM)
Way to try and dodge and to try to spin your way out of being against freedom of the press!
Right, freedom of press is protection from the Government so thank you for showing and agreeing that Trump is wanting and trying to violate their free press rights! -
Yermom_Is_God — 10 months ago(May 27, 2025 10:48 AM)
Again, free press doesn't include government funding, you keep missing that part.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
Yermom_Is_God — 10 months ago(May 27, 2025 06:46 PM)
No, simply because you try and wish it into existence strictly for your political talking points doesn't necessarily make it so. There's nowhere in the 1st Amendment guaranteeing the government fund media organizations.
and refuse to answer if you are for free speech or not.
I never once refused to answer, you never asked, you just made a bogus accusation that I was against it, stupid. I'm very much for free speech, I'm not in favor of government funding media organizations. Two very different things.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
Yermom_Is_God — 10 months ago(May 27, 2025 08:57 PM)
No, I'm against government funded media organizations. Free press doesn't include government funding. You're still not understanding this important fact.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
CoffeeMugShot — 10 months ago(May 27, 2025 07:29 AM)
There must be enough who watch and listen to them where Trump wants to take away the funding of channels which is taking away their free press rights.
Are you for or against freedom of the press even when they report the truth making the Orange One look bad, which is his own doing.