Better then the first?
-
jmbwithcats — 20 years ago(August 09, 2005 06:49 PM)
That's not much of a reason behind your opinion but okay. Thanks for sharing.
http://www.kittysafe.net -
jmbwithcats — 20 years ago(September 06, 2005 02:32 PM)
Well as a whole yes, but a movie is made up of elements and each movie had strong and weak elements.
http://www.kittysafe.net -
Alex_Is_Legend — 20 years ago(September 08, 2005 02:41 PM)
I prefer part one. I agree that the deaths and dialogue is better, as well as the ending.
I also didn't laugh out loud while wathcing the original, but I did laugh out at the line "o.j. left more blood than that on the bronco." in this one. -
jmbwithcats — 20 years ago(September 08, 2005 02:54 PM)
I'm glad someone can be objective with me here.
http://www.kittysafe.net -
koffeenkreame41-1 — 15 years ago(September 09, 2010 07:42 PM)
Well 1 & 2 were better than Return to House on Haunted Hill and Urban Legends: Bloody Mary, they were awful, not even Kate Mara could help with Bloody Mary. 2 was funnier than the first. For me, Jennifer Morrison, Loretta Devine, Anthony Anderson, Eva Mendes, Joey Lawrence and Hart Bochner were cool in here to me. I loved the reveal of the killer in the original a little better because it was a huge shock. I love the first one, but this one had funnier lines especially by Anthony Anderson & Loretta Devine.
"Man, fv
"Now, everyone outta the creepy ass graveyard, uh, that includes the undead!"
"I am the ultimate badass, you do not wanna*beep*wit' me!" Hudson in Aliens. -
hnt_dnl — 14 years ago(February 23, 2012 10:02 AM)
I don't think Part 1 was meant to be comical. UL1 was grounded more in irony and dark humor than silly comedy, which this movie kind of had. I think the first movie is definitely better and is more of a true horror movie, but I still actually like this sequel, probably because it's fun in it's own way.