Don't Quite Understand!
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — 102 Dalmatians
Rebecca90 — 21 years ago(February 26, 2005 01:58 AM)
Hi, I am a little lost with this movie! Why in 101 was Dipstick owned by Roger and Anita and by Chloe in 102? All the dogs and characters have changed apart from Dipstick and Cruella. Please explain!!
Edited to say:
Is Chole Anita and Rogers daughter that we see at the end of 101? Is this how Chloe gets Dipstick? Oh, wouldn't Dipstick already died of old age? Confused!! -
TerritorialHawk — 21 years ago(March 02, 2005 07:49 AM)
Chloe isn't Anita and Roger's daughter, I think she's just a "friend of thiers", someone who they knew. She got dipstick off them.
The reason all the dogs changed is because of the amount of time between the first film and this film - the puppies in the first film are now grown dogs. -
-
ooohhhmmyyyy — 20 years ago(July 23, 2005 04:50 PM)
maybe the Dearlys sell dalmatians as their reputation or Chloe is a cousin of one of their's so she got one of their dogs. Too bad the movie never explained how she got him. Maybe the movie wanted us to wonder and come up with our own reasons.
http://s10.invisionfree.com/Nova_Infinity/ -
Guardian_Of_The_Hills — 19 years ago(April 23, 2006 02:51 AM)
Too bad the movie never explained how she got him. Maybe the movie wanted us to wonder and come up with our own reasons.
Same thing with how the Oompa Loompas reproduce when they clearly show no female ones. An (U)n(E)xplained (M)ystery.
~This is a message and opinion of a mouse~