here's an example for you dumb ****s:
-
AnthonySockssss — 1 year ago(January 21, 2025 06:49 PM)
are you ****ing stupid? i didn't bring up the contract in my initial post because ASS-BOOMSHIT is the one who brought it up in a reply. i then responded with his contract comment with two examples: one where a contract was signed and one where one wasn't.
-
AnthonySockssss — 1 year ago(January 21, 2025 07:27 PM)
- how can they force her to give birth if she already terminated the baby, moron? either way, she violated a contract. that contract is telling her what she is supposed to be doing with her body. if she doesn't follow it, she breached the contract. end of story.
- " the surrogacy contract covers these things." yeah, no ****. but if she decides to terminate the pregnancy, you must be a callous prick to think she doesn't deserve to be held accountable for killing a baby that was intended for someone else. she made that choice for someone else.
-
-
insurgent — 1 year ago(January 21, 2025 08:39 PM)
Whether it gives you happy feelings or not, this is absolutely in line with abortion rights. It would be the risk a couple takes. The government shouldn't meddle just bc the law makes people sad in a random hypothetical scenario that is probably so rare it's statistically insignificant
-
JFC — 1 year ago(January 21, 2025 08:46 PM)
Legally speaking there is a contract in place and there would be damages the surrogate would be liable for.
If it were John's sperm, Jane's egg or both, then the damages would be greater unless explicitly stated in the contract what the remedies were.
Arguing other things isn't going to get you very far until we are just hashing out belief systems and where those systems intersect.