here's an example for you dumb ****s:
-
JFC — 1 year ago(January 21, 2025 08:46 PM)
Legally speaking there is a contract in place and there would be damages the surrogate would be liable for.
If it were John's sperm, Jane's egg or both, then the damages would be greater unless explicitly stated in the contract what the remedies were.
Arguing other things isn't going to get you very far until we are just hashing out belief systems and where those systems intersect. -
/. — 1 year ago(February 13, 2025 05:10 AM)
A contract is you giving away your autonomy within the terms spelled out by the contract. If you don't adhere to the agreement, there are damages and remedies, usually spelled out in that contract.
If there was no contract and a remedy is sought, then you find a 3rd party to contract with to provide a judgement. Most people in the U.S. (for example) use the court system because they believe it to be the way to go. This isn't exactly true, but discussing that further goes down a bit of a rabbit hole. -
/.ㅤ — 1 year ago(February 02, 2025 06:42 AM)
So what do you want to do? Do you want to force the surrogate to go through with the pregnancy?
It's a **** situation for John and Jane but the time and effort spent suing someone over their bodily autonomy would be better spent finding a more committed surrogate.
My password is password. -
Yermom_Is_God — 1 year ago(February 02, 2025 03:23 PM)
The "my body my choice" people literally only apply this standard to baby slaughter. That's it. They want choices limited or restricted on damn near everything else. These people were also the biggest Covid tyrant retards, demanding lockdowns, forced masking, vaccine mandates. They are not pro choice, they are pro abortion but try to re-brand it with a nicer sounding title.
"I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit." -A fucking idiot -
/. — 1 year ago(February 13, 2025 05:05 AM)
This isn't a natural situation. Situations created by people are then decided by people. We don't live in heaven and we have autonomy. This is what the legal system is intended for.
When people go to court, they are essentially contracting with another party and giving their autonomy to them to decide within the boundaries of that case brought to court. Which is why they take great pains to not open doors to other issues in a trial. That's what "objections" are all about.
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. 