Kirsten needed…

[fgadmin]

Johnny_Lovegood — 18 years ago(July 19, 2007 02:07 PM)

My gosh, they'er just F$%&in' boobs! If you didn't like them, you could of just turned off your stupid t.v.!

[fgadmin]

blu_panther69 — 18 years ago(July 20, 2007 06:40 PM)

hit a nerve did we? it's just talk so don't be getting ur panties up in a twist.

[fgadmin]

margauxmm — 18 years ago(July 22, 2007 09:18 AM)

the bra thing didn't bother me as much as the oily hair, what's up with that???

[fgadmin]

blu_panther69 — 18 years ago(July 24, 2007 01:26 PM)

you do have a point there..her hair was pretty gross, lol.

[fgadmin]

Angie2965 — 18 years ago(July 25, 2007 12:50 AM)

LOL yeah its kinda hard not to notice them flopping around all over the place!!!

[fgadmin]

ishboo5003 — 18 years ago(July 26, 2007 02:22 PM)

i think she looked perfect. she always does. greasy/dirty hair is hot on a girl. and kirsten is super hot. and i enjoyed her without a bra

[fgadmin]

geek_is_sexy — 18 years ago(July 26, 2007 09:51 PM)

I just thought her boobs looked huge! Way bigger than any other film. That was suprising. I thought the bigger boobs looked great on her plus I think she might have put on a little weight for the role. All of her other roles she is sooo tiny & almost flat chested.

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

izwiz2011 — 18 years ago(July 26, 2007 10:16 PM)

holy her boobs had a life of their own they were flopping around everywhere! You would think she could afford a bra.ha

[fgadmin]

ps-mn — 18 years ago(August 15, 2007 12:04 AM)

people, people, it's the character she's portraying that has greasy hair and doesn't wear a bra. The director John Stockwell and she talk about it on the DVD audio commentary.

[fgadmin]

blu_panther69 — 18 years ago(August 27, 2007 01:16 PM)

ummmaybe some of us don't have the movie on DVD(yet)..so we wouldn't know if having greasy hair and no bra was apart of the character or not, anyway we are all just talkinthat's what people do.

[fgadmin]

aquilite — 18 years ago(September 22, 2007 08:12 PM)

actually, it's pretty obvious she was a girl who just didn't give a beep about anything. including her appearance. it was pretty apparent to me and i didn't have the dvd either.

[fgadmin]

dreameluva — 18 years ago(October 04, 2007 02:00 PM)

DITTO. i mean i thought she was a lil gross and im gettin mad at carlos because im like babe your rally hot, but exactly, it was their character.
( . )( . )

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

squeekyfish — 16 years ago(April 18, 2009 05:40 AM)

omg! I just saw this movie and came on here to see if anyone else thought the same thing!
I personally found it really distracting to see them sticking out like that and as a girl I was also watching in pain as she ran down the stairs and they were jumping up and down like there's no tomorrow.
But yes i understand the whole "That's the character she was portraying!" thing so i'm not dissing the director's choices, kirsten or anyone I'm just saying, it was distracting for me, personally.
I played poker with tarot cards I got a full house and four people died!!

[fgadmin]

siobanphotogirl — 16 years ago(August 10, 2009 03:50 PM)

boobs bouncing all over the place was distracting for me too really annoying
wearing a bra is annoying the stupid straps rarely stay in place i wish i could go without one but bouncing boobs and full headlights are really unattracive in my opinion!
i don't remember being distracted by her hair though. but i bet if i watched it now it would be on my mind!

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

SunflowersRblueLULU — 15 years ago(April 26, 2010 01:31 PM)

she was supposed to be troubled in the movie, thats why her hair is all oily too

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

Tebay71 — 14 years ago(January 14, 2012 08:04 PM)

It's not nasty, it's AWESOME
To flee is life. To linger, death.