It is a b-movie. don't you get it?
-
pornstaar — 18 years ago(February 11, 2008 02:49 PM)
anyone renting a movie called teenage caveman and actually think it is gonna be a good movie needs to be shot. Hollywood chainsaw hookers and zombie bikers from detroit etc are not blockbusters either. I did not think I'd have to explain that a movie with this kind of title will be a bad one. wake up, geniuses!
-
-
Unicorn-9 — 22 years ago(November 11, 2003 05:11 AM)
"Just lots of pointless sex. if thats your idea of a good movie then you're watching the wrong genre."
Surely if pointless sex (or, at least, pointless nudity) is our idea of a good movie then we're watching precisely the right genre? Unless you want to sink to outright porn, I guess. -
EmperorKagato — 22 years ago(November 27, 2003 02:55 AM)
LMAO. What made the movie for me was the character Judith. More balls than any other character in this movie. Oh man.. would i like to.. anyway. This movie is B and was meant to be B. However it could have been stellar by staying within the dark world/tone and put more time into script and story development. It would have been great! Great enough for a sequal too!
They should have let Judith lived. Some of the actors portrayed their character the best they can. A pissed off teenage guy with a testorone problem. A very hot girl indeed(in bed)[typical scary movie]. A boy who is not only annoying but dumb yet still funny("I want a gun"). You really can't expect top peformance from this cast, yet they did a great job.
Oh, btw. The sex in this movie wasn't pointless like in some other movies i've seen, its an important plot element. I still love how the story sticks to limited view making you guess what is going on.
I still do not think judith should have died, that made me upset. The actor really did make this movie for me. sigh..
"YOU KILLED JUDITH!" -
alexelia — 22 years ago(December 13, 2003 06:58 PM)
I just remember watching this thing late night last summer and I've never felt so horrible. Sure movies can make one laugh, feel sad, outraged, etc. This film though, made me sick to my stomach. It was just horrible. I can enjoy B movies and homages to them as well, but this was just awful, and thinking about it makes me nauseous. BLAHgh
-
cowens16 — 22 years ago(February 10, 2004 02:19 AM)
Kids is a great movie. Bully was good. This movie is utter crap. I realize that b-movies are supposed to be campy and all like that, but this movie is a piece of garbage. The only thing that made it watchable was the naked women every few minutes. So don't complain about the nudity. It was the ONLY good point of this film.
-
virus_arcane — 20 years ago(May 14, 2005 10:09 PM)
that wasn't Larry getting a BJ in Brown Bunnyhe's obviously not a pedophile, because hiring people under 18 and having them nude on screen is ILLEGAL. Even if it was OFF SCREEN IT WOULD BE ILLEGAL. F uckin g ignorant pricks. Anyone who judges people more popular than them, are just jealous. Go f uc k yourselves. cry babies.
-
jimmyrookie — 20 years ago(August 13, 2005 04:37 AM)
I actually thought this was a pretty good movie, sure the acting isn't exactly A-Movie material, and there was gratuitious sex/nude scenes but the plot itself was refreshing. A new take on the "Monster who poses as a human, and slowly takes over a group of humans" .. it's more believable than some. Genetic Engineering to produce a race that can survive the coming apocalypse, genetic engineering gone wrong.
Can the human mind really survive immortality? Especially after decades/centuries of isolation, especially when they were not emotionally/mentally mature when they were cast into isolation.
I agree this is a B-Movie/Skin-Flick, but it's one of the better B-Movie/Skin-Flicks i've ever seen. -
bajama — 17 years ago(August 14, 2008 03:08 PM)
Why would someone waste the time, effort and money to make a movie that's supposed to be bad? Did Larry Clark wake up one morning and say "I want to make a beep movie!"?
No, he doesn't make beep movies on purpose. He's just a beep movie maker.
