PORN?????
-
sergiomena — 21 years ago(March 12, 2005 01:24 PM)
LO-FREAKING-L
I was watching this thing on some cable television show with my friends, and guess what was the thing that came right after this movie? Porn! This movie is crap! If you liked "Back Door Sluts 9" then you'll love teenage caveman. -
sara-216 — 21 years ago(March 22, 2005 09:34 PM)
Ick. Icky-ick. Teens having a threesome and then in the middle of an erotic moment, one of their guts bursts open while the other 2 laugh at it? Random. Disgusting. Pointless. Like Pornbut less intelligent. What does this have to do with CAVEMEN?! Couldn't even watch the whole thing.
-
janders64 — 20 years ago(April 22, 2005 11:51 PM)
If you had known who Larry Clark was then you wouldn't have been surprised. He's made a career out of making artsy sexploitation. This movie was the exeption. The artsy parts were not included, so all that was left was the explicit sex and violence. A movie not for the faint of heart, but I found it thoroughly enjoyable.
-
cassiegreaves — 20 years ago(April 23, 2005 06:41 AM)
after i watched the film i thought it was some twisted softcore porn film.
that girl gettin her self off to the other girl imploding, whats that about. if i had had anything to do with making this film i would have refused to put my name on the credits. -
aasilverio — 20 years ago(June 13, 2005 08:26 AM)
mee too
i buyed this film,because i saw"ken park",and i mean that i will see the samething,but what i can see is just "buts",i do my best effort to try see a just "penis" but i can not see .
its a pitty because larry clark can show the teenage enviroment very well,now i will see "bully",but i thing that i will be dispicious.
i dont thing that the film"ken park" is a porn movie,it is the essence of the enviroments that there is around the tennagers..
if aniboby can indicate others films with several nude full frontal male scene,
it will make me happy.. -
harkesy06 — 20 years ago(November 08, 2005 08:43 PM)
I was up at 4 am and I turned on one of the HBO channels, which was playing this movie. I never heard of it, so I gave it a watch. I couldn't watch the whole thing; but I think I can safely say this might have been the worst acted/written/produced movie I have ever seen. And I've seen a lot of bad movies.
-
UESC_Marathon — 20 years ago(December 23, 2005 02:18 PM)
Whatever, this is quality cinema. I can't believe I never heard of this before I saw it on HBO recently. They should be playing the hell out of this gem on cable TV. Next time I see I definitely gotta tape.
-
jmota-1 — 20 years ago(December 23, 2005 03:45 PM)
This movie is cheesy, pointless gore, pointless sex, pointless nudity, sorry ass acting, but I have to admit, it was entertaining. It's a lousy movie, and you know it is crap when you watch it, but it is Entertaining so you keep on watching it until its over. Thats the best way I can explain this film. I started watching the end of this movie last night on HBO2E, I wanted to see the beginning of it to watch it all so I stayed up to 2:15am to watch it on HBO2W so it is entertaining even though it is utter crap.
-
UESC_Marathon — 20 years ago(December 23, 2005 09:12 PM)
What more can a film be but entertaining? Art pshaw! Even "Artsy" movies are still just entertainment. Think anyone would watch David Lynch if his movies weren't enjoyable? Thats why I would have to say that "Teenage Cavemen" is probably the best movie ever made. It has none of that unnecesary bullcrap that most "great" movies make us suffer through, just pure, unadulterated, entertainment. This is an example that, if followed, could just save the film industry
-
jmota-1 — 20 years ago(December 24, 2005 01:01 AM)
You may be on to something. Think about it lately box office numbers are low and the price of this films runs into the hundreds of millions. If one were to take a step back and spend alot less, and sacrifice quality to make a film entertaining, it might just save the movie industry. Well put my friend
-
carawayl — 18 years ago(August 13, 2007 08:59 AM)
Then you obviously didn't see New York Minute with the Olsen twins. This is a sexploitation farce and anyone of the many opinions that I have read showing much indignation must not be familiar with the genre. It is not supposed to be "good" or have redeeming value. It's supposed to fill a "non-porn" but close to porn - it's "soft core" porn - "need" in the middle of the night for mostly adolescent boys from 14 - 84.
All of you absolute twits who do not get that please rest assured that the violence and sex in this movie will reach fewer children and potential serial criminals than "Grand Theft Auto" which gives the 11 - 18 year olds who play it points for killing cops and raping innocent victims. That massively successful and technically brilliant piece of entertainment is meant for prime time and is easily accessable for everyone. It's very user friendly, too. I know a policeman who's kid plays that game and others like it. If there was a game on the market that gave points for killing rooftop administrators - I don't believe a copy would be in my child's computer game collection. I don't feel that same threat with Teenage Caveman.Key words: "Farce", "after midnight", Not to be "taken seriously".
