PORN?????
-
harkesy06 — 20 years ago(November 08, 2005 08:43 PM)
I was up at 4 am and I turned on one of the HBO channels, which was playing this movie. I never heard of it, so I gave it a watch. I couldn't watch the whole thing; but I think I can safely say this might have been the worst acted/written/produced movie I have ever seen. And I've seen a lot of bad movies.
-
UESC_Marathon — 20 years ago(December 23, 2005 02:18 PM)
Whatever, this is quality cinema. I can't believe I never heard of this before I saw it on HBO recently. They should be playing the hell out of this gem on cable TV. Next time I see I definitely gotta tape.
-
jmota-1 — 20 years ago(December 23, 2005 03:45 PM)
This movie is cheesy, pointless gore, pointless sex, pointless nudity, sorry ass acting, but I have to admit, it was entertaining. It's a lousy movie, and you know it is crap when you watch it, but it is Entertaining so you keep on watching it until its over. Thats the best way I can explain this film. I started watching the end of this movie last night on HBO2E, I wanted to see the beginning of it to watch it all so I stayed up to 2:15am to watch it on HBO2W so it is entertaining even though it is utter crap.
-
UESC_Marathon — 20 years ago(December 23, 2005 09:12 PM)
What more can a film be but entertaining? Art pshaw! Even "Artsy" movies are still just entertainment. Think anyone would watch David Lynch if his movies weren't enjoyable? Thats why I would have to say that "Teenage Cavemen" is probably the best movie ever made. It has none of that unnecesary bullcrap that most "great" movies make us suffer through, just pure, unadulterated, entertainment. This is an example that, if followed, could just save the film industry
-
jmota-1 — 20 years ago(December 24, 2005 01:01 AM)
You may be on to something. Think about it lately box office numbers are low and the price of this films runs into the hundreds of millions. If one were to take a step back and spend alot less, and sacrifice quality to make a film entertaining, it might just save the movie industry. Well put my friend
-
carawayl — 18 years ago(August 13, 2007 08:59 AM)
Then you obviously didn't see New York Minute with the Olsen twins. This is a sexploitation farce and anyone of the many opinions that I have read showing much indignation must not be familiar with the genre. It is not supposed to be "good" or have redeeming value. It's supposed to fill a "non-porn" but close to porn - it's "soft core" porn - "need" in the middle of the night for mostly adolescent boys from 14 - 84.
All of you absolute twits who do not get that please rest assured that the violence and sex in this movie will reach fewer children and potential serial criminals than "Grand Theft Auto" which gives the 11 - 18 year olds who play it points for killing cops and raping innocent victims. That massively successful and technically brilliant piece of entertainment is meant for prime time and is easily accessable for everyone. It's very user friendly, too. I know a policeman who's kid plays that game and others like it. If there was a game on the market that gave points for killing rooftop administrators - I don't believe a copy would be in my child's computer game collection. I don't feel that same threat with Teenage Caveman.Key words: "Farce", "after midnight", Not to be "taken seriously". -
mattpoobumbum — 19 years ago(July 04, 2006 10:27 PM)
I watch porn sometimes (everyone oes at once) and I'm a die hard Larry clark fan and horror fan and I loved this film but that is my opion.
You guys seem not to like and thats okay butb owell.
Peace,
Matt -
brymon — 19 years ago(November 15, 2006 08:21 PM)
Get off the subject of slagging porn. Porn is for one reason. Movies are for another. (although sometimes you can jerk off to a movie)!!!
I have not seen this movie but as soon as i get a copy i am watchin this. i am so excited about the prospect of watching this movie.