Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Neil's shown to be much more competent than David, in pretty much all aspects, so why did the board vote 5-2 in David's

Neil's shown to be much more competent than David, in pretty much all aspects, so why did the board vote 5-2 in David's

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
5 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Office


    eight_days — 10 years ago(February 12, 2016 08:09 PM)

    Neil's shown to be much more competent than David, in pretty much all aspects, so why did the board vote 5-2 in David's favour to be Jennifer's successor?
    "Don't cry, it is to be. In time, I'll take away your miseries and make 'em mine. D'Evils."

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      y_bother_brother — 10 years ago(February 14, 2016 07:36 PM)

      Funny thing is I watched this episode for the first time in years last night and thought the exact same thing. Guessing that he knew some board members personally when Neil might not have known them, or David had probably been in the company much longer.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        drakeyequation — 10 years ago(February 18, 2016 12:25 PM)

        I'm sure you've heard the old adage "it's who you know, not what you know" that counts in business. It could've been good old-fashioned nepotism that won him the vote. David appeared to be well connected within Wernham Hogg, due in part to his overriding need to be everybody's mate.
        David was supposed to be a somewhat competent manager before the documentary. He won 'UK Manager of the Month' and must have been doing something right to keep a managerial role for all those years. However, once the cameras showed up, he revelled in the limelight and let his fifteen minutes of fame compromise his job.
        Also, Neil was younger and more of a go-getter than David, the board might have felt that David was a safer bet in the long run.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          archer1267 — 10 years ago(February 23, 2016 11:46 AM)

          I've wondered this tooit's a leap of faith you need to make, because so much depends on that premise. I had trouble reconciling that, though 🙂
          One thing I like about the US version is that as bumbling and incompetent as Michael Scott is most of the time, there were moments that showed him in his element - creating relationships with potential customers - that reminded the viewer that he was actually a very capable salesman who'd happened to be promoted well beyond his abilities. I didn't really get that from David Brent, aside from that shot of him demonstrating the cleaning cloth on a sales call. We don't really get to see him shine in any way.
          But yeah, that scene of him on his hotel room bed, drunk and babbling about how Neil was going to be an utter catastrophe and how the company was going to beg him to come back, all I could think of was "Why would they possibly want you back?"

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            UN_Jefferson — 9 years ago(December 28, 2016 02:06 PM)

            Because what you saw was a stitch up, they took the good bits out.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0

            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • Users
            • Groups