Thats all I have to say.
-
anthonylinsell — 18 years ago(February 16, 2008 10:10 AM)
I watched Four Rooms last week and that was definately one of the worst films i've ever seen. Swept Away however was fine, maybe because I was expecting something truly awful but it really wasn't bad. It just goes to show you can't really trust reviewers to make a fair judgment as they will always bring their preconceptions to the table. Their are far worse actresses than Madonna and I guess because everyone gives her such a hard time it makes her work that much harder.
-
takiko-1 — 17 years ago(February 15, 2009 02:45 PM)
It just goes to show you can't really trust reviewers to make a fair judgment as they will always bring their preconceptions to the table. <
At the same time, critics have to "waste" or "spend" their time watching every terrible movie out there. Like Ebert and Roper are hoping that the movie is good, because they won't get back the two or three hours they spent in the theatre watching it. And when From Justin to Kelly came out, the studio refused to screen the movie to the critics so they paid to see it and the part that Roper was partly annoyed about is when the public spends ticket money on a movie and can't get it back when it's terrible. -
killdawabbittn — 15 years ago(May 17, 2010 06:24 PM)
"Like Ebert and Roper are hoping that the movie is good, because they won't get back the two or three hours they spent in the theatre watching it."
BooHoo. What an awful job sitting in a movie theater stuffing your face with popcorn and getting paid to do so. Those are probably the only two or three hours they had to 'work' each day. -
lyricaldon — 15 years ago(May 11, 2010 07:59 AM)
I really did enjoy Swept Away. When I watched it years ago I had not checked out any of the reviews on this, so did not have a bias viewpoint towards it. I however really did enjoy this film, I thought it was an amazingly well made piece.
This is all I have to say on the matter.
-
Mylobage — 16 years ago(May 07, 2009 03:56 AM)
ya this used yo be the worst movie ever but i stumbled upon a movie called strangeland and O M G at least this was sum what entertaining until the end i gave it a 2
"Go to the hospital"
"I cant besides, its getting darker and more painfull that means its healing" -
luxter2000-1 — 16 years ago(September 22, 2009 01:47 AM)
How the bloody hell can you say it's the worst movie you've seen if you watched 10 minutes of it?!
I have to admit this wasn't a fantastic film and originally I thought the ending was bollocks but after realising that it was mean to be raw passion/feelings vs social captivity I would have to say that more than anything it's that this wasn't portrayed so well.
Ritche didn't tell the audience effectively enough that Madonna's character chose to go with her husband over Peppe or why. -
KrisNAz — 16 years ago(December 28, 2009 07:44 PM)
Showgirls is worse, trust me.. and there is a horrible movie with Josh Lucas that he made back in his early days called No Money Down,, the quality is grainy and looks like it was filmed on a cam corder. It is so bad it's not even mentioned on his website. Atleast Swept Away had some good cinematography,, if it wasn't for Madonna stinking up the movie, it would have been alot better.
And anything with Carmen Electra makes the top of my sucky list too. -
alvink — 15 years ago(April 08, 2010 06:21 PM)
worst movie ever???
maybe yes, and maybe no, but please, don't anybody ever use that term again until they have watched 'terror in tiny town', a late thirties western starring midgets riding on shetland ponies.
i agree that the movie in question bites the big one, but the worst movie ever???? no way.
42 -
Thereminator101 — 15 years ago(December 05, 2010 11:47 AM)
"Terror in Tiny Town"?I must see it! The worst movie Ive seen in the last several years is "Cabin Fever".Not even the scantily clad women could save this steaming pile of regret! The original Swept Away was one of my favorite movies.
:@ :<3