Why no # 3?
-
drzoidbergrox — 15 years ago(May 15, 2010 09:14 PM)
thats what i was thinking!!
I would love to see a third one!
this August,
"Step Your Game Up"
..in
3D!
www.imdb.com/board/11193631/ -
ForCenturies — 15 years ago(May 16, 2010 11:16 AM)
Chances were slim when the sequel came out due to poor critical reaction, and similar box office takings than the first film. It would have been a minor gamble on the studio's part.
Chances are even more slim now that John Forsythe (Charlie's voice) and Bernie Mac (Bosley #2) have unfortunately passed away, as well as bitterness between Lucy Lui and Bill Murray.
That is all. -
moviestar26 — 15 years ago(May 21, 2010 07:50 AM)
You're right. I think the chances of a third movie seem pretty thin. However I'm sure that they can find a replacement for Bernie Mac and Charlie's voice. Plus Murray and Liu can work things out. They are not kids !!!.
-
Dash99 — 15 years ago(July 01, 2010 05:19 AM)
All three actresses have said they would want to do a third. They could still do one, Bill Murray wasn't in the second one, Bernie Mac could come back or just hire another "comedian" type actor again.
Anyway isn't MGM the studio that produced these 2 films seriously in debt? -
joshuaberkowitz-02635 — 9 years ago(January 29, 2017 09:44 PM)
if you want a box office opinion on it. The first did well 125 million on a 90 million budget (domestically)but the sequel (cleary) cost much more yet barely broke 100 million domestic. Its rare a franchise that makes less with each sequel but costs more would continue making them.
Unless its saw. Those films are so cheap they could.make half of the one before and still get a sequel.