Now I didnt mind the first Angels movie. And i figured, what the hey, this might be a bit of fun like the first one was.
-
betogoode — 18 years ago(November 27, 2007 02:22 PM)
Although I wouldn't call this the worst movie ever made, it certainly was awful. The only thing that made the first one even partially watchable was the fact that Bill Murray was in it. Take him out of the equation, and these two movies were almost equally bad.
Your world view makes my a$$ itch -
RobertHolik — 18 years ago(December 04, 2007 08:46 AM)
How can you say that Batman And Robin and Superman 4 are the worst movies ever?
Wouldn't the worst be those kinds of movies you can't believe you just saw?
Like Home Alone 3, Son of the Mask etc.
My IMDB profile: http://www.imdb.com/board/22702669/ -
xswijnji — 18 years ago(December 21, 2007 05:49 PM)
i hated this movie. the first one was enjoyable, and then this one just plain SUCKED. the CGI and animation during the fighting was so insanly bad i couldnt believe it. let alone how UNBELIEVABLE some of the fighting scenes were. Only thing good about this movie were some of the funny parts. everything else was just stupid and way to over the top.
-
ur2sexy4me27 — 18 years ago(December 27, 2007 03:10 PM)
I don't care what anyone else thinks, I loved both of the CA movies. They weren't meant to be taken seriously! That's why I liked them so much! The movies were just about kicking some butt, girl power and having a good time! I don't care if anyone makes fun of me, I still love these movies!
-
L_Lawliett — 16 years ago(February 02, 2010 01:49 PM)
"I don't care what anyone else thinks, I loved both of the CA movies. They weren't meant to be taken seriously! That's why I liked them so much! The movies were just about kicking some butt, girl power and having a good time!"
I agree with you, I loves these movies lol, as you said they arent meant to be serious, theyre meant to be funny, "cheesey" in a sense, and have cool action scenes because thats what the series was like really (I used to watch it as a kid
) -
crysjumar — 12 years ago(February 17, 2014 12:43 PM)
I don't care what anyone else thinks, I loved both of the CA movies. They weren't meant to be taken seriously! That's why I liked them so much! The movies were just about kicking some butt, girl power and having a good time! I don't care if anyone makes fun of me, I still love these movies!
Exactly.
I watched Full Throttle back to back yesterday.
-We Provide..Leverage -
scott-the-dot — 17 years ago(October 13, 2008 01:51 PM)
Pheeeew! What a stinker!
Ouch! That hurt.
This film is way worse than Superman 4 and Batman and Robin put toghether.
It's so completely one-dimensional. The first one was at least vaguely watchable but this one was really painful.
The motocross bit looked like something out of Power Rangers.
Ouch! -
Gamer21t — 18 years ago(January 04, 2008 03:58 PM)
Wasn't the worst but does indeed suck something awful. I can appreciate it when a movie isn't to be taken seriously but this just goes way too far. The action isn't enjoyable and looks ridiculously and the jokes simply blew. Bill Murray, who was about the only decent thing in the first movie, is gone and that just makes this one all the worse. A lot of people just like the three hot girls but I don't sit through 90 minutes of beep to see hot girls and who cares if they're hot or not? A million hot girls couldn't save this movie. The only thing I liked in this movie THE ONLY THING, was when Bernie Mac talked about the "Black Irish." The ending car wash scene and the Pussycat Dolls scene may have been aesthetically pleasing but so was Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within and that was one of the biggest pieces of cow dung ever. Good Night and enjoy the breeze.
-
stachogan — 18 years ago(February 14, 2008 10:37 AM)
This film was god awful.. it truly was..truly unbelievable.. thus I hate it..
I get it's a filmbut it's a film set in a reality similar to ours not one where a person can fly, not survive a huuge car crash.. or where someone can survive being thrown through a massive glass window..
Stupid stupid movie..
And why can the Irish man jump like.. 20 feet and not die, and why can he WALK THROUGH FIRE..
This film angers me..
Come and get it, bitches. -
safaribacardi — 17 years ago(August 13, 2008 04:26 PM)
The Worst Movie in the History of Cinema? Hyperbole, yes, BUT - this has to be in the discussion. I didn't mind the 1st flick. I checked my brain at the door, and whatever, it was dumb and campy, but enough fun that I didn't ask for my money back.
Full Throttle, however, should replace waterboarding as the most effective interrogation technique the Department of Defense has. I wanted to sit back and enjoy a mindless romp like the first, but I just wasn't strong enough. It's a real turd. This movie is complete OVERKILL. No, I wasn't expectin' Citizen Kane, let's get that straight. I expected something like the first.. what I got was Charlie's Angels 1 on acid. Dumb is acceptable for these types of movies, but WE HAVE TO DRAW A LINE SOMEWHERE. Over-the-top is one thing, but there was no conflict, nothing interesting, barely any laughs, and not a damn thing could I tip my cap to besides the fact that the financier had deep pockets. I can forgive this trash because it knows it's campy, the 1st got by on that, but I can't forgive this trash because it doesn't seem to care it sucks. -
Monknificent — 17 years ago(October 14, 2008 11:41 AM)
Yep, pretty well put there
The only smart thing about this movie was its poster, and the only people who had fun in relation to this film were the three female protagonists.
The rest of us (well, those with IQs in treble digits, at least) were in turn: blinded and deafened by what was coming off the screen and from the speakers, then annoyed, then angry, then saddened, then depressed, then angry again. Then we wanted to strangle McG. Then we got tired and slept. Then we tried to forget all about this, for the sake of our blood pressure.
Sigh