Too obvious
-
OptimusPrime2 — 19 years ago(July 19, 2006 04:22 AM)
Well at first I thought Samuel Jackson but as the movie crept on I realized how bad and stupid it was so I thought maybe it could be Andy Garcia. I mean the script is sooooo bad that I thought maybe it was possible. Doesn't really matter who it was though because it would of been a stupid choice no matter what. If it was Andy it would be dumb because he was very obvious and had no motive. If it was her ex bf it would be dumb because he was even more obvious and if it was Judd herself it would of been dumb because well I don't think ppl just black out and kill ppl. Samuel was just plain dumb because well hes in it for about 2 mins. The old lady next door would of been a better choice then all of them.
-
Jacob_Solus — 19 years ago(July 22, 2006 06:25 PM)
w/e..I was still surprised when Samuel L Jackson was the real killerjust because he's a big star, doesn't mean u have to think it might be him cuz he doesn't even appear in the movie that much, therefore why would he be there at all. When you're from another country and u know nothing about the actors,if it's a rapper, or if it's a big shot or a small shot, you get to enjoy movies more than when you know such things as I wrote in the first sentance.
-
Munky216 — 19 years ago(September 06, 2006 04:50 AM)
Yep, way too obvious. With these types of films you just pick the person you'd least expect BUT is one of the main characters. It would have been so much better if it was revealed that Mr. T was the killer. I pity the fool that drinks the wine filled with Rohypnol!
I'm very sorry for your loss. Your mother was a terribly attractive woman. -
gorgeous_cow — 19 years ago(October 16, 2006 10:24 AM)
It would have been so much better if it was revealed that Mr. T was the killer.I pity the fool that drinks the wine filled with Rohypnol!
hahahahaha oh my god i haven't read a post this funny in ages
hum.
well i didnt get who did it till very late in the film, i originally thought it was the shrink. heh
but i did wonder throughout the movie "why oh why did Samuel agree to do this? hmmmis it?? nah..it'd be even dumber than the movie itself"
the ex boyfriend option wasnt even plausible. remember how Jackson's character makes him look like a fool in the beggining? this guy couldnt be such a "careful" serial killer.
and the partner theory doesnt stick either, apart from lack of motive etc (which in a movie this bad, perhaps it doesnt even matter as one can be made up in the end or whatev), when he lights a cig, he uses matches. there's no annoying yet oh so scary clickety click click in that.
My beep so cool that when he goes to bed, sheep count him. -
quick-26 — 19 years ago(November 14, 2006 05:56 PM)
Perhaps you shouldn't have opened a thread that said "too obvious" till AFTER you watched it. I logged on simply to confirm my guess.
I got too bored and now it's off to watch house.
BTW, I find it embarrassing that this movie cost $50 million to make* and even more embarrassed that's it's almost earned enough to cover its losses.
It's terrible!
*http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=twisted.htm -
cmdevons — 19 years ago(November 14, 2006 05:58 PM)
The movie is a murder mystery. The title of the thread was Too Obvious. What did you think was going to be discussed?
I already figured it was SLJ, and I only watched the first 20 minutes on TNT. Spoilers? Seriously?
For that matter, most of these posts were from years ago, when the movie came out. So no one who originally posted was going to be around to feel bad about spoiling the big secret. -
DoubleDeuce — 19 years ago(November 14, 2006 06:12 PM)
It doesn't matter if it says "Too obvious." You still have to identify SPOILERS you jerks. "Too obvious" could have meant an ambiguity- as in "it was too obvious who the killer is" and not even mention who it actually was. I hope the administrator revokes your IMDB privileges.
"Good. Bad. I'm the guy with the gun." -
mk723 — 19 years ago(March 31, 2007 11:54 AM)
I'd never heard of this movie until a few minutes ago, while reading Rotten Tomatoes 100 Worst Films. As soon as I read the plot I was like, "Samuel L. Jackson is the killer" and I came to the message board specifically to find out if I was right. I was hoping that I was wrongthat I did not really solve this movie's "mystery" without having ever seen a second of it or having ever even heard of itbut goodness help me, I did.
"Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glorylasts forever." -
bite_me_loser_86 — 14 years ago(October 15, 2011 07:19 AM)
Totally agree. I knew 15 minutes into the movie it couldn't be Ashley's character, because that would just be too simple. It also became increasingly obvious that her partner was just a red herring. I strongly suspected Jackson pretty early into the movie. I thought his motive would be that he secretely loved her and didn't want to see her with other men, and I was right.
-
Pumpkinjack65 — 13 years ago(February 21, 2013 05:26 PM)
i really kind of wish they would of kept the lighter clicking sound not in the background cause you kind of knew every time the killer would strike while ashley judd's character was passed out. and then you knew that when sam jackson has the lighter you knew he was the killer and has a motive being he was overprotective and did not want the same mistakes judd's character mother did