Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. This movie should be around a 6.1

This movie should be around a 6.1

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
6 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Garden State


    bluefiredreams — 9 years ago(August 13, 2016 02:16 AM)

    Garden State tried so hard to prove itself, and that's where it failed. It wanted to be a quirky, unique "indie" flick, but it just didn't feel believable. It ended just being quirky with little substance.
    Braff did "okay" for his first movie, but wow, this was way overrated. It took Braff years to make another movie. It's almost like he even knew that his first attempt was a subpar attempt.
    For those who said this movie spoke for "an entire generation". I hope you now have higher standard for an "entire generation" then a 2 hour melodramatic, in-your-face, pseudo indie flick.
    It's like a 14 year old that says to her/his mother "you will never understand me!!!". But, actually she does, very well. You just don't know it yet.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      NoEasyBucketsBro — 9 years ago(August 17, 2016 04:13 PM)

      Haha there's something funny about you specifically saying 6.1 instead of 6. Just say 6 dude. I will say that I was one of those people that overrated it the first few times I watched it, but I pretty much agree with you now. It hasn't aged very well and it does have a way of tricking you into thinking it's a better movie than it actually is. I think Natalie Portman was a big part of that because she plays such a lovable character.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        BleekersPorkSword — 9 years ago(August 21, 2016 06:57 PM)

        More like 8.1

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          movie_nazi — 9 years ago(August 23, 2016 09:36 PM)

          I gave this movie a 5 back when I first saw it and I stand by it.
          My Vote history:
          http://www.imdb.com/user/ur1914996/ratings

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            mattwag — 9 years ago(October 08, 2016 09:24 PM)

            I mean yeah it's not the greatest movie, but one of the reason's I (and probably others) liked it is because it was relatable.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              dcoydcoy — 9 years ago(January 05, 2017 01:56 AM)

              6.1? That's funny! I say 7.842, ya nutty dipshjt

              1 Reply Last reply
              0

              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Users
              • Groups