A non religious perspective of the movie.
-
arkayenether — 9 years ago(October 29, 2016 01:17 AM)
Hi arkayenether, you said you don't believe the God of the Bible, but you are reading it.
Does that mean, you're not convinced, or swayed, that its true? I'm curious as to what are the things, that make you not believe.
Fossil records, common sense, and science. -
Rumble_McSkirmish — 9 years ago(October 29, 2016 02:48 AM)
Then what are you doing reading the Bible. Finished with Harry Potter?
Christ, are you really this dumb? You know people can have interests in things that aren't true, right? Or maybe he had to read some of the bible to learn what it really said when another liar for Jesus, such as yourself, approached him with a stupid comment.
Panzer vor! -
Navaros — 9 years ago(October 29, 2016 12:21 PM)
Fossil records, common sense, and science.
That stuff all proves the Bible, bro. And it also
disproves
the belief system of darwinism into which you apparently put your faith.
Here is a site for more reading about that:
http://www.evolutionfairytale.com/
"Science creates fictions to explain facts" Gilman -
Rumble_McSkirmish — 9 years ago(October 29, 2016 04:22 PM)
Lol, fossil records shows evolutionary changes over millions of years
That stuff all proves the Bible, bro.
A book that says everything that is was poofed into existence as is and the timeline for the earth is 6 thousand years
Lol, ok Navs, back to the psych ward for you
Panzer vor! -
Gus-69 — 9 years ago(December 24, 2016 01:04 PM)
Try linking an actual science site for the sake of discussion, not an apologetic one.
-
Navaros — 9 years ago(October 28, 2016 07:46 PM)
I agree that this film mostly portrays the Bible accurately. Although Satan in this film is not a "human" like you say. Rather, he is a demon who takes on a somewhat human form. In fact, if Satan
was
"just a human" like you are misinterpreting this film's representation of Satan to be, then this film would be doing the opposite of what you are praising it for, by contradicting the Bible.
But I do agree that the Satan actress did a great job.
"Science creates fictions to explain facts" Gilman -
Rumble_McSkirmish — 9 years ago(October 29, 2016 06:25 AM)
Think of Satan as kind of legion. He is everything and nothing. Satan is that one guy in the story you have to pin for everything bad while the real culprit sits on a throne being worshipped by peons.
Hell, when you read through the bible Satan is accused by a lot of people, but only actually does very littleand his death count is like 10, tops
Panzer vor! -
Navaros — 9 years ago(October 29, 2016 12:20 PM)
I meant what Satan looked like as opposed to saywhatever that character Tim Curry played in Legend was called
Oh, I see what you mean. IMO both types of representations of Satan are valid. The Curry-style Satan focuses more on his debasement, and the POTC-style Satan focuses more on his combination of charm and former beauty and debasement. But both styles are pointing to aspects of Satan that he has, so one style is not "more correct" than the other.
"Science creates fictions to explain facts" Gilman -
Flame_of_Udun_49 — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 11:54 AM)
I agree that Gibson did a very good job of presenting a somewhat fresh take on Satan.
Yeah - Satan as 'woman.'
Mel checks all the boxes - racist, homophobe, misogynist.
http://tinyurl.com/hxoedgj -
Flame_of_Udun_49 — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 11:51 AM)
whatever that character Tim Curry played in Legend was called
Darkness
http://tinyurl.com/hxoedgj