Mel Gibson's 'Passion of the Christ' Sequel Titled 'Resurrection'
-
bastasch8647 — 9 years ago(November 10, 2016 09:37 PM)
Yes, there is some public demand for it, especially, of course, among MG fans. But I think it will take an excellent screenplay in order to pad out the story's running length - that is, to film it as written without adding-in non-biblical material, as he did in
The Passion
(and was done in
Risen
).
Perhaps a sequel might be a chance for MG to include several important scriptural teachings that he left out of
The Passion
. That, at least, would be a bonus, if he saw fit to do it. -
marty-130-840283 — 9 years ago(November 11, 2016 02:03 AM)
But I think it will take an excellent screenplay in order to pad out the story's running length
Not sure what you mean, The Passion was a 24 hour period, 1 day, turned into a 2 hour movie.
The Resurrection was 3 days, Mel should have zero trouble with story length. -
-
Rumble_McSkirmish — 9 years ago(November 28, 2016 05:26 AM)
When was Jesus thrown from a bridge? Or the thief's eye plucked out by a raven? Or where Satan, for some reason, takes part with the infant antichrist?
Take your own advice, stop lying.
Well, given your knowledge of your own religion and its texts, I guess technically you aren't lying, just ignorant
Panzer vor! -
Navaros — 9 years ago(November 27, 2016 07:07 PM)
The article in the OP make it sound like this sequel is not actually going to be about Jesus. Jesus will probably just be a tertiary side character.
That's not really a sequel to POTC.
If the movie follows that "make up a fictional story that follows random people" template, it will probably be crappy.
"Science creates fictions to explain facts" Gilman