Jesus died for the world's sins, so why no change?
-
raif-1 — 9 years ago(October 19, 2016 08:25 AM)
And aren't there quite a few in Islam who take exactly this view with severe, and often fatal, consequencies for those who apostate?
Yes, when you're right, you're right. All I can say is that life is a test, test for both believers and non-believers. GOD will be the best judge of them.
However, making things clear and unambiguous would certainly work to persuade many disbelievers, especially those agnostics and soft atheists like me (for I accept I could be wrong about not believing in God) with an open mind, or with 'red line' events in mind which would trigger conversion. God knows this, and what would 'work', so why not act to fulfil his own will? Are you seriously saying that the most powerful force in the universe would not try to secure more believers for fear of rejection among some? Or that securing even one extra soul would not be worth making itself unambiguous for?
I don't see it as a fear of rejection like you put it but imo, this is a mercy from GOD. This ambiguity is always a test and we have been given brains so use it to choose wisely.
I am not sure what the Qu'ran says but I do not remember the Bible insisting that the way to God has to be made hard. Your words sound like special pleading for where there is no clear evidence for the deliberate supernatural. 'Signs' are seen yes, but clearly not all agree what they are and could be, while they appear most favoured by those determined to see them such as the overly-zealous. A lack of ambiguity instead might reasonably be expected to serve the urgent need come to God best and work to convince the doubters.
"Hard" here is an opinion. Some might say the trinity is hard, some may notso who is to say which is harder?
Again with the ambiguitymaybe some help with a link, yes?
http://muslimdebate.org/polemics/atheism/385-answering-an-atheist-question-why-doesn-t-god-show-himself -
filmflaneur — 9 years ago(October 19, 2016 08:56 AM)
This ambiguity (over whether a god exists and which one) is always a test and we have been given brains so use it to choose wisely.
Why should salvation be a test, does the end really justify the means in this way? Heaven and sight of a god is what is good for one not the hard road, or the expense of credulity. to get there. And surely a lack of information in the sense of clear and unambiguous evidence makes 'choosing wisely' far more difficult than it ought to be?
"Hard" here is an opinion.
It is also an observation of what is actually the case, with the world fractured, as always between competing religions and gods. Even within Islam there are obvious, and very fractious, divisions over the best apprehension of your deity.
The following quote shows the topsy-turvy special pleading from the link you supplied:
(then) everybody would be believers. But thats not what God wants
The rest seems to be about the necessity 'tests', which we have already covered and which still sounds like special pleading, or the fact that, apparently, your god has
already
shown itself. So where is he?
You are really mentally ill!
You must be homosexual.
Melanie000 -
Rumble_McSkirmish — 9 years ago(October 19, 2016 10:07 AM)
Point being that for such a major event it basically did nothing and had no effect anywhere on anything, and outside of religious texts has no mention anywhere and is even unknown still in large areas of the world.
Panzer vor! -
marty-130-840283 — 9 years ago(October 19, 2016 08:30 PM)
Point being that for such a major event it basically did nothing and had no effect anywhere on anything, and outside of religious texts has no mention anywhere and is even unknown still in large areas of the world.
it did something, and had an effect on everything.
Jesus's sacrifice provided salvation for your soul, "after death" , not on this earth.
Why do I have to repeat myself with you? Its like talking to a brick wall, the information doesnt go inside your ears or your brain. -
Rumble_McSkirmish — 9 years ago(October 19, 2016 10:13 AM)
I've had this conversation with raif before. This is where the end result was that god does create people specifically to be destined to hell. I'm assuming these tests are to catch these people, you know, for whatever reason so he has a reason to send them to hell, much like he placed the tree of knowledge and his tempting serpent in the garden so he had a reason to dump on humanity.
Maybe to followers they have some justification for this type of stuff (Christians seems to be all God's will and Satan), but to me it just says this stuff was written by people making stuff up based on their outlooks and social hangups of the period because the only other answer, to me, is that people worship an ass hole-ish monster
Panzer vor! -
Navaros — 9 years ago(October 19, 2016 03:38 PM)
I wouldn't buy a car based on a lack of firm information and evidence for claims made, let alone invest in a whole belief system.
Oh yes you would, as
proven
by the fact that you
already did
!
You invested in the belief system of darwinism even though it lacks any firm information for any of its outlandish, extraordinary claims!
"Science creates fictions to explain facts" Gilman -
Navaros — 9 years ago(October 19, 2016 03:28 PM)
Which raises the obvious question as to why not.
"Why not" is because
there is no possible way
to make everyone believe the truth
unless
God forced everyone to be robot-like creatures with no Free Will.
to make an informed decision based on evidence
That's
impossible
, because any evidence God gives you, you will spin doctor away with fabricated alternative explanations.
I.e. God shows you soft tissue in t-rex and triceratops. If evidence was really capable of changing your mind, then when that happened, you would have realized the truth that soft tissue could not be present unless evolution is false, the earth is young, and dinosaurs lived recently and at the same time as humans, exactly like the Bible says! But noinstead of letting the plain-as-day evidence change your mind, you darwinists simply pull another fabricated explanation out of your butts in order to re-validate your religious myth within your own minds.
So too would the same thing happen with any and all other evidence that God might give you.
"Science creates fictions to explain facts" Gilman -
filmflaneur — 9 years ago(October 20, 2016 03:46 AM)
there is no possible way to make everyone believe the truth unless God forced everyone to be robot-like creatures with no Free Will.
But even so, O Mighty Navaros, there is a way to persuade (not coerce) many more to come to God and fulfil His expressed will - which "will be done" remember: by simply making Himself known clearly and unambiguously to all. Arguing that He won't do so simply because 'some will always remain obdurate' does not explain why this same consideration did not deter God from the far more complicated, and painful, act of supposedly sacrificing Himself, er, Jesus back in the day. Either He wants more souls or not.
because any evidence God gives you, you will spin doctor away with fabricated alternative explanations dinosaurs lived recently and at the same time as humans
Find some authoritative evidence for this particular example, then that is peer-reviewed, not of the scriptural or personal-revelation type and try us then. Have any human skeletons been uncovered amongst dinosaur bones? Do we have extant any ancient recipes for tyrannosaurus steaks?
evolution is false,
In the light of this, any luck yet on explaining the appearance of antiviral resistance? lol
You are really mentally ill!
You must be homosexual.
Melanie000 -
Navaros — 9 years ago(October 26, 2016 10:46 AM)
there is a way to persuade (not coerce) many more to come to God and fulfil His expressed will
No, there isn't - because any evidence God shows you, you will fabricate excuses to deny it. Exactly like how you fabricate excuses to deny the truth that soft tissue in dinosaurs prove that they and the earth are young and that evolution is therefore undeniably false.
by simply making Himself known clearly and unambiguously to all
Again, that is impossible to do, because
no matter what He does,
darwinists like you will make excuses and deny the truth.
You are literally asking for the impossible, and then blaming God for when the impossible does not happen.
Find some authoritative evidence for this particular example, then that is peer-reviewed
You are making an appeal to authority logical fallacy. You put your faith into your darwinist dogma because peer groups of darwinists slap each other on the back and say to each other, "yeah bro, we support your darwinist stories as truth because we are darwinists too! Therefore, everything we say is true!" If darwinism has not brainwashed you
too
much, and if you can still reason, then you will see why this "logic" is inherently invalid.
not of the scriptural or personal-revelation type and try us then.
Soft tissue proves that dinosaurs lived recently, and therefore that the "billions of years" dogma which your evolution myth
needs
is false, and therefore that your evolution myth itself is false. One does not even need to open the Bible to realize any of that. It's all plain-as-day irrespective of the Bible [even though the Bible of course debunks evolution too because the Bible is the truth and evolution is a lie]. The evidence of soft tissue, in and of itself, proves all of that.
But you will deny and make excuses for that truth because the darwinist religious dogma which has infested every fiber of your being compels you to do so. And so too would every other darwinist do likewise, because they too are deeply indoctrinated with that same religious dogma.
any luck yet on explaining the appearance of antiviral resistance?
I don't need any "luck" nor "explanation" for that, because that is
not evolution.
Every single time that happens, it is either devolution or variation within a kind.
And the fact that darwinists like yourself have to
grasp at straws- like you just did there - by using shadily using the word "evolution" to mean
multiple different things - and then conflating the observable versions of your definitions with the unobservable versions of your definitions, only further corroborates the undeniable truth that you have have zero observable, testable, or repeatable evidence for any of your religious myth's outlandish, extraordinary claims.
If you
did
have evidence, then you would
need not
play shady semantic word games.
"Science creates fictions to explain facts" Gilman
- like you just did there - by using shadily using the word "evolution" to mean
-
mamu2 — 9 years ago(October 26, 2016 10:57 AM)
Again, that is impossible to do, because no matter what He does, darwinists like you will make excuses and deny the truth
Are you suggesting that something is impossible for God? Wouldn't God know exactly what it would take for every non-believer to suddenly believe? Couldn't he just do that? -
Navaros — 9 years ago(October 26, 2016 11:14 AM)
Are you suggesting that something is impossible for God
Norather, I am suggesting that it is impossible due to
the condition of
Free Will, which is something that God chooses to allow mankind to have.
Wouldn't God know exactly what it would take for every non-believer to suddenly believe?
So you want God to become the equivalent of a clown who is hired to perform balloon tricks at a kid's birthday party? Do you even know how crazy that sounds? God is the SOVEREIGN of the universe, not a personal dancing monkey. Have some respect for the LORD.
"Science creates fictions to explain facts" Gilman -
mamu2 — 9 years ago(October 20, 2016 06:21 AM)
"Why not" is because there is no possible way to make everyone believe the truth unless God forced everyone to be robot-like creatures with no Free Will.
The choice is accepting Jesus, not whether or not God actually exists. God can make his existence known to everyone on the planet and that would not negate our free will to choose Jesus or not. Not everyone would choose to worship God or accept Jesus if they knew he existed for a fact, if it really is the God of the Bible.
God sure made sure he showed his existence to people in the OT, so it shouldn't be an issue.
you would have realized the truth that soft tissue could not be present unless evolution is false, the earth is young, and dinosaurs lived recently and at the same time as humans
You may want to do some reading on that. And not from an apologist site. Something factual. -
Navaros — 9 years ago(October 26, 2016 11:05 AM)
God can make his existence known to everyone on the planet
No, He cannot -
unless
He chose to violate Free Will - because there is no possible way to "make his existence known" for which darwinists would not fabricate excuses/alternative explanations to the truth of God's existence.
What you and FF are proposing is a false premise. You false premise neglects everything I just said in the first paragraph of this post.
God sure made sure he showed his existence to people in the OT
He showed Himself to select godly people in the OT when He had good reasons to do so. He did not, however, show Himself to ungodly people out of a need to 'prove' Himself, which is what you and FF are asking for.
Something factual.
"Factual?" What makes it "factual" when it comes from darwinist sources? The truth is:
absolutely nothing.
Read the sig.
You
and your fellow darwinists
assume
that darwinist authors are "factual" because your shared religious beliefs dictate that you must. But in actual fact, darwinist-written dogma is not factual at all.
And that is also proven by how darwinists are
constantly
re-writing their stories because the facts of reality are constantly proving their stories to be bull crap. If your stories were "factual" like you allege them to be, then that re-writing would be impossible.
"Science creates fictions to explain facts" Gilman -
mamu2 — 9 years ago(October 26, 2016 11:52 AM)
unless He chose to violate Free Will
He's done that in the Bible (Pharaoh), so it's not like he wouldn't ever do that.
He did not, however, show Himself to ungodly people out of a need to 'prove' Himself,
Sure he did.
God revealed himself and his power to the ungodly Pharaoh and the Egyptians with the plagues.
God revealed himself to the ungodly Babylonian king Belshazzar by a large hand writing on a wall.
God revealed himself to the ungodly Philistine king Abimelech in a dream.
Even the Resurrected Jesus revealed himself to the ungodly Saul of Tarsus.
Etc
It almost seems like you are inventing this stuff up as you go along, instead of using the Bible to support your assertions. Many things you claim about God and the Bible can be refuted by the text itself.
What makes it "factual"
That it can be demonstrably shown to every person on the planet. Whereas God cannot.