First Hellboy should have a higher rating than II

[fgadmin]

Kent_Kainer — 11 years ago(July 27, 2014 01:30 AM)

I agree as well. I rated the first one 6 and the second one 5 but not because of cheesy scenes. The second one was much more predictable and thus pretty boring. Good for me it had these nice visuals.
Lincoln Lee: I lost a partner.
Peter Bishop: I lost a universe!

[fgadmin]

Morbius_Fitzgerald — 11 years ago(December 09, 2014 04:12 AM)

I find a problem with the first film is that it has a good first and third actthe second act just drags! You have to suffer through that "Hellboy is jealous of Myers" plot point and his relationship with Liz being complicated and do we really need this?
"I have always valued my lifelessness."

[fgadmin]

Shadow-345 — 11 years ago(January 03, 2015 11:34 PM)

Exactly, it's a problem i've had with the first film since I saw it.
Why people prefer the first because it's "scripted better" when it clearly isn't, is beyond me.

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

lilwith — 10 years ago(October 19, 2015 07:44 PM)

Hellboy 4/10
Golden Army 6.5/10
II gets the edge for being so beautifully shot and action scenes done a bit better.

[fgadmin]

buddyboy28 — 9 years ago(April 26, 2016 12:12 PM)

I much prefer the original too.

[fgadmin]

dargis49-300-900689 — 9 years ago(June 05, 2016 09:37 PM)

Agreed. First movie is better.

[fgadmin]

IMDB_Vits — 9 years ago(July 01, 2016 08:46 PM)

HELLBOY
1: 8/10
HELLBOY
2: 6/10

[fgadmin]

prplayer — 9 years ago(August 28, 2016 04:59 AM)

disagree, i thought 2 was slightly better than 1, it has more interesting characters and it's equally visually stunning as the first
so many movies, so little time

[fgadmin]

DesterWallaboo — 9 years ago(October 20, 2016 02:16 PM)

I agree. I give the first Hellboy a 9 and this one a 6.