The Return of Doctor Mysterio Review Round-Up
-
keekosdoctor — 9 years ago(December 26, 2016 05:52 AM)
Dude, literally everyone is biased.
What does a review without bias even look like? Far as I can tell, that would boil down to "this an episode of Doctor Who. It was written X writer, features X actors, and runs for X minutes with X plot points. Review complete." -
BernieSanders — 9 years ago(December 26, 2016 10:07 AM)
There's a difference between having minor favourability and outright lying about the quality of the episode. It's like saying that the Nazis fought well in the last 2 months of WW2. Factually incorrect.
-
TrickyDicky007 — 9 years ago(December 26, 2016 03:34 AM)
The British and fandom critics always love every episode, regardless of its quality. It's no indicator of whether or not the episode is good. Remember when IGN rated Love and Monsters something like 9/10?
No, they don't. And I've posted no fandom reviews here, or I would've linked to Doctor Who TV, Blogtor Who etc.
So stop trying to convince yourself that it was good, it was awful.
Sorry? First off, I already thought it was good (good, not great) so I don't need to convince myself otherwise. Second, I'm just sharing these reviews here for anyone who wants to read them - the fact that they all seem to be positive (more positive than I probably would've given) and that p*sses you off is no concern of mine. Which is why I guess you've got to convince yourself that it's one giant, biased conspiracy.
Let's roll some tits up the flagpole and see if anyone gets wood. -
A_Man_of_Iron — 9 years ago(December 26, 2016 06:36 AM)
A- from IndieWire:
http://www.indiewire.com/2016/12/doctor-who-christmas-special-review-return-of-doctor-mysterio-river-song-1201762654/