You're Jeff: Who Would You Save/Forgive?
-
LuckyMatt93 — 16 years ago(October 14, 2009 04:22 PM)
I would only save Halden. He was innocent and only did his duty as a judge. Danica was a cold (ironic, eh?), heartless, and despicable monster who deserved to die. Timothy would be the cause for all of my pain and suffering in the first place because he made the stupid and irresponsible choice to drink and drive. I would have let him die too.
"You don't know what death is"-Sam Loomis (Halloween 2) -
Horror_Movie_Lover_Bot — 15 years ago(August 18, 2010 03:07 PM)
Well if I was Jeff (which I never would be since I hate kids and I would never want one of my own.)
I would let them all live. No hard feeling, since a death of a child wouldn't mean much to me. -
ezchoice — 15 years ago(September 21, 2010 07:50 AM)
I'm not religious but in that situation I would save them all. Whether or not I actually forgave someone I had those feelings toward is somthing else.
Jeff had to be the worst character in the entire series. I mean how weak is one expected to be? Bad things happen in life, that's a fact. Letting someone freeze to death at the hands of a serial killer is about as low as it gets in terms of lows.
The first time I watched Saw III I cringed at Jeff's base and useless self. After re-watching it (not sure why since it really was an awful movie but I am a horror fan) I was actually glad to see that his wife was cheating on him, the only problem was that she should have told him to go to hell while she was dying.
The movie could have been decent if they had thought of a more sinister motivation behind his son's death. -
mfentruck — 14 years ago(September 12, 2011 01:47 AM)
I really can't comprehend how so many people would have just let them die. That's a little creepy to me.
I couldn't just sit there while someone was being tortured to death if I had an opportunity to save them. I just couldn't do it. -
johnc11982 — 14 years ago(October 10, 2011 01:45 PM)
The thing to remember is, it's not as simple as flipping a switch and then the person lives, or grabbing a key off a table and unlocking them. To save them, he had to rip a bit off of his face, burn the last physical things he has to remember his dead son by, and take a bullet. He has no obligation to do any of those things, and thus isn't "responsible" for the peoples' death even if he chooses not to do them.
Jigsaw, on the other hand, he had to actively kill. "Saving" him merely meant refraining from killing him. And since Jigsaw posed no imminent threat (and actually offered a way out - "I can have an ambulance here in four minutes"), to refrain from killing him IS an obligation.
I'm actually not sure which ones I would save and wouldn't save. But I could only really be called wrong for "not saving" Jigsaw. -
shrugs — 14 years ago(October 19, 2011 04:04 AM)
None of them should die, obviously. If a judge makes a mistake then he should be reprimanded not drowned in rotten pig mince. The same goes for the others, none of them set out to cause harm to anyone, excepting jigsaw and I wouldn't even kill him. I find the entire premise ridiculous even for a Saw movie.
What if a squirrel wants a sausage? -
ZabyPS3 — 13 years ago(October 26, 2012 07:13 AM)
I would have waited until Timothy's arms and legs were twisted, then I would have saved him. Then I would have choked him to death with my own bare hands.
I cannot understand how anyone could forgive someone who had killed their son whilst drink driving!!?!? Seriously, some people here would actually just pat him on the back and say, don't worry about it, thse things happen. Really??? A life for a life as far as I'm concerned
The Judge was only doing his job with the evidence he had, and the laws he has to follow? I don't agree 6 months is a fit sentence, but his hands were tired (no pun in 10 did!). I would have saved him.
The girl, she was probably scared and drove off. Her testimoney would not have changed things. I would have saved her.
an almost George Lucasian (!) fit of ass hattery -
mattiasflgrtll6 — 12 years ago(April 19, 2013 04:54 PM)
I would try to save them all, of course. I wouldn't stand watching somebody die. I wouldn't even freakin' argue to spill time! That's why the freezing girl and the drunk couldn't be saved in time!!! Stupid Jeff.
-
HayleyDelRey — 12 years ago(June 01, 2013 12:47 AM)
I would save them all. It isn't my place to be their judge and jury- if I have the opportunity to save their life, I'm going to do my best to make sure they all walk out alive. The death of others won't bring back my son.
-
junkhotshot — 11 years ago(July 06, 2014 06:06 PM)
What is with all the hate with the first woman who just drove off? She did 100% nothing, other then freak out. People who think she would have died are sick in the head.
The judge What did he do wrong? Did he sentence the drunk driver lightly? Was there not enough evidence? Did he pick the weakest sentence possible or was his hands tied? Not enough information, but overall I felt he did nothing wrong and seemed like a good person.
The drunk driver. I would still have saved him (cause I am not a monster), but I felt he was easily 100x worse then the other two. It was his fault that the boy died. He decided to drink, he decided to drive while drunk, and he was unable to avoid killing the child.
Dont be lazy, use the
tag. -