Don and Megan
-
Karl Aksel — 5 years ago(June 26, 2020 06:01 PM)
That's a bit pointed, but it's not that far from truth. In the case of fiction, of course, the characters come from the writers. I don't know who wrote or directed the relevant episodes, but I find it funny that either a) no one objected to how Megan was written, or b) that the objections were overruled.
-
Karl Aksel — 5 years ago(June 26, 2020 11:23 PM)
I replied the way I did because you replied the way you did. And you replied as if I was reaching out to you specifically. "Thanks for letting me know" - with a reply like that, why did you reply at all? Oh, and I notice you changed your user name from "I'm the woman you hate" to "Lisa Flowers". Way to be a dick.
-
Gigi S. — 5 years ago(June 26, 2020 11:33 PM)
I'm just not in the mood for this hostility from a weird person such as yourself. I was being nice, you obviously have a few screws loose. We can change our usernames at will. I don't know what else to tell you other than what occurred beteeen us initially wasn't as confusing as you are making it out to be. Please don't keep arguing with me over this. Thanks.
-
Karl Aksel — 5 years ago(June 27, 2020 06:07 AM)
If I misinterpreted your meaning, then my apologies. Your initial response seemed to be quite hostile (as if you were saying, "yawn, nobody cares"), but your username gave me an opportunity to reply in an ambiguous way. I figured if your initial reply was not meant to be hostile, then you would interpret my reply to you as tongue-in-cheek. If, however, your first post
was
hostile, then my response could be interpreted as equally hostile. Your reply, which came with a name change which made
my
reply seem
overtly
hostile, seemed to confirm the latter.
This new tack of playing the meek little kitten who has never been anything but nice doesn't convince me, however, because for sure, at no point were you being
nice
.