I started cheering for the bay guys when…..
-
General Comment — 14 years ago(March 21, 2012 12:37 PM)
Hmm I'm not so sure this is right. It isn't easy to take a human life if you've never done it before, not when there are other alternatives available. At this point in the movie the victims were in control, had the gun, and apparently outnumbered the villain 4 to 1. I didn't find the character's decision in that scenario too far fetched, as she was a rational type, rather than a Charles-Bronson-style vigilante, and was no doubt considering the consequences of just shooting someone in cold blood.
-
Augustus_Octavian — 12 years ago(May 05, 2013 03:23 AM)
The negative consequences were minimal, if not non-existent.
More importantly, she made a considered choice. She weighed her options and she felt that she was willing to risk dying/being raped, that that was something she was willing to live with. And she will have to live with that. -
-
drrclavan — 13 years ago(January 17, 2013 03:55 PM)
That was a very lousy thing to do indeed. She even got the knife from the dead guy and could have very easily just slit the throat (or stab in the back or whatever) of the main culprit and it would all have been over. Instead she ran away, ditching the knife. Women!
-
iainhammer — 13 years ago(June 21, 2012 12:22 PM)
Or in the 'warehouse' when she could have, should have, taken the glass and cut the bad guy's throat instead of doing the cliched thing of dropping to her knees sobbing and NOT paying attention. Despite its attepts to appear vaguely feminist, the movie still traded on the stereotyped behaviors/tropes of woman-in-jeopardy without re-thinking them.