Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. I don't care how bad things might have looked…

I don't care how bad things might have looked…

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
32 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #10

    HalBanksy — 9 years ago(September 03, 2016 05:27 AM)

    Well lots of lovely "corrections", sadly you don't seem to understand the majority of what I wrote.
    during their drive they stop the car and turn it off to watch the giant beast go by. They peacefully sat there without any problems.
    haha. Are you joking? The people were clearly in shock and finally coming to terms with how screwed-up the world has become. They didn't just stop the car and sit back enjoying the lovely view. "peacefully" lmao
    the mist was not full of horrific monsters everywhere
    Yes - the
    audience
    knows that by the end the film. The point is that the
    characters
    in the car do not. Quite simple.
    the father murdered the child without any explanation after the boy awoke
    Are you seriously suggesting that was the plan That he intentionally waited for the boy to wake up, and then shot him?
    Obviously
    the idea was to kill him when he was asleep. The writers had him wake up first to make the decision seem even more tragic. Again, quite simple - Not sure why you have to have this explained to you.
    it's wild speculation at best to say everyone in the store died after they drove away
    I didn't "speculate" that at all, in fact the film heavily implies that everyone at the store survives until the end. When I say "they held out longer than anyone else in the store" I didn't mean they literally were alive longer, but they mentally held on to their senses for longer. Everyone in the store was willing to murder the woman and child - ergo they have "lost it." The film is showing how far people can be pushed until they reach their breaking point - the religious woman was the first to snap because she was clearly unstable already. The people who were left in the car were the last to cling onto humanity and
    HOPE
    .
    It didn't get worse. The situation shows everything better for everyone, except the dad.
    JFC I'm clearly talking about the situation
    from the fathers p.o.v

    • Why are you being purposefully obtuse about this? The film is
      his
      story, and it only ever got worse for
      him
    • Denying that fact is complete delusion.
      the dad was scared of monsters in the dark/mist that weren't even there
      Again, why TF are you judging the actions of the
      characters
      from the knowledge of a
      viewer
      ? That's not how cinema works The monsters
      WERE
      there in the minds of the people in the car. There is not a single piece of evidence in the film to suggest they had any idea that help was so close. They were driving away from it the whole time.
      Really being scared of what's in the dark/mist would make you slowly go crazy?
      They let their fear of what might be in the mist cause them to make rash irrational horrific decisions.
      Yes - Well done! Showing that is the entire purpose of the film. Good bye.
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #11

      andrewpi7 — 9 years ago(September 03, 2016 04:55 PM)

      haha. Are you joking? The people were clearly in shock and finally coming to terms with how screwed-up the world has become. They didn't just stop the car and sit back enjoying the lovely view. "peacefully" lmao
      lmao I never said they were enjoying the view. I said "peacefully" as in waiting while they were
      not
      attacked despite stopping the car & turning it off. I was not talking about their state of mind, which surprisingly their quietness meant hopelessness to you.
      Yes - the audience knows that by the end the film. The point is that the characters in the car do not. Quite simple.
      Quite simply, the characters in the car do not know if the mist if filled with monsters or not. You're the only one who imagined
      "The mist is full of horrific monsters that want to rip you apart"
      ,
      no one
      in the film stated that much less any of these 4 characters so again your imagination saw a completely different movie.
      Are you seriously suggesting that was the plan That he intentionally waited for the boy to wake up, and then shot him?
      No, I never said that.
      Obviously the idea was to kill him when he was asleep. The writers had him wake up first to make the decision seem even more tragic. Again, quite simple - Not sure why you have to have this explained to you.
      Thanks Captain Obvious, but while I agree obviously having the boy looking at the father is more tragic, the problem is the way the director did it makes the dad appear even more crazy and his sudden transition into crazy land even more unbelievable. The boy didn't wake up like a piece of toast jumping out of toaster with the bullet already shot out of the gun. The boy slowly woke up while the dad poorly and coldly decided let the last thought of his son be that of fear and betrayal of his dad murdering him, unlike if the boy was asleep or looking away or agreed to suicide with his dad. Apparently this dad of the year couldn't wait to kill his son. If any parent kills their son because they are afraid a bully/stalker/animal/alien *
      might

      • be in the dark to hurt & kill his boy then that parent is crazy and should go to jail. At that point, the dad became a monster in this film which is all tragically fine IF the ending wasn't so rushed and soo fake.
        I didn't "speculate" that at all, in fact the film heavily implies that everyone at the store survives until the end.
        Nothing at the end suggests the remaining people in the store didn't survive.
        When I say "they held out longer than anyone else in the store" I didn't mean they literally were alive longer, but they mentally held on to their senses for longer. Everyone in the store was willing to murder the woman and child - ergo they have "lost it." The film is showing how far people can be pushed until they reach their breaking point - the religious woman was the first to snap because she was clearly unstable already. The people who were left in the car were the last to cling onto humanity and HOPE.
        Again, your imagination saw a very different movie. Nothing suggested
        everyone
        else in the store was crazy and willing to murder. We see a crowd circled for the big confrontation and
        some
        of the people grab weapons (
        some
        of those
        may
        murder), others chant/pray (
        never
        grabbing weapons), others yell like kids in a school yard watching a fight, and others stand and watch (possibly planning against the dad or the crazy religious lady), but we never know exactly what each non-speaking minor character is thinking much less that
        everyone
        not in the dad's group had "lost it" and were 100% behind the religious lady wanting crazy murder.
        JFC I'm clearly talking about the situation from the fathers p.o.v - Why are you being purposefully obtuse about this? The film is his story, and it only ever got worse for him - Denying that fact is complete delusion.
        Again, why TF are you judging the actions of the characters from the knowledge of a viewer? That's not how cinema works The monsters WERE there in the minds of the people in the car. There is not a single piece of evidence in the film to suggest they had any idea that help was so close. They were driving away from it the whole time.
        sigh
        At best, you're being completely obtuse to what I said. Of course, the dad is the protagonist and doesn't know help was in the mist. As far as they knew outside the vehicle were aliens (intelligent? friendly? hostile?) or humans (friendly? hostile?) or just nothing alive for miles. Yet, even IF the movie ended after the 4 bullets there is not a single piece of evidence in the film for any of the 5 people in the vehicle to think monsters were definitely close to the car or for any viewer to think any of the 5 people were slowly "losing it" to create imaginary monsters in their minds. If only the dad suddenly snapped going crazy then it might have been more believable. For all 4 unique strong adults to all suddenly mentally "lose it" and all the exact same way & all surprisingly being quietly ok with mass suicide & child murder simultane
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #12

        taran-rod — 9 years ago(May 11, 2016 06:57 PM)

        This scene gives the term "unhappy ending" a whole new perspective! Why do I see so many threads here that are beep on the ending? If you are blind to the point that you can't see why this endings is powerful, you might really need to watch more movies!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #13

          debunkerboy — 9 years ago(May 13, 2016 03:07 PM)

          I agree with you and so have probably most people who have seen the film, but I think there is more going on here than the scene as you describe it. Yes, they could they and should they have waited, but our frustration at their lack of fight goes beyond this, because we also never see them make any effort to siphon gas or get off road to seek shelter. Nothing. Inexplicably they go from actively fighting to passive surrender, totally squandering their hard fought chances outside the store. And then just passively going to a mercy kill involving a dad blowing his kid's head off is infuriating because it is so far out of character from what has gone before. It's as if a whole different group of people have replaced Drayton and his crew. Our vicarious investment in their struggle is cruelly mistreated just so the director can work in rather obvious and facile twist. People hate this ending so much because it is such a cheat!
          We don't care if they all die, we don't want a happy ending, we want an ending that is true to the film. The ending is absolutely false and out of character, even defenders of the ending feel it. It's just that some people are so blown away by the phony melodrama they rationalize this error away.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #14

            evolution_500_2 — 9 years ago(May 15, 2016 11:15 PM)

            "we want an ending that is true to the film."
            But the ending
            is
            true to the film, though. The movie is about how fear causes people to behave in irrational ways, making some of the most stupid and costly mistakes imaginable in the process.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #15

              zigomanis18 — 9 years ago(August 28, 2016 07:29 PM)

              Totally Agree here.
              The way it all ended abruptly made absolutely no sense. They were determined to fight to the endSo, would think that as they were slowly drivingnothing attacked them and As they drove on and on, it obviously became apparent that there was no ending to the mist. Now, of course that was not true because the Army was cleaning things upbut they did not know that. So, as the car started to run low on gas, common sense would dictate that you need to find gas as a first priority. You may want to siphon gas, or maybe just use a gas pump. The pumps probably still worked and I am sure between 4 adults they probably had a credit care for the pumps. Yeah, the 10 minutes or so to stop would be potentially very dangerous but the alternativehaving the car run out of gas leaves you with absolutely NO chance at all.it just does not make sense that they would keep driving the car as it went to fumes..and then immediately make a quick decision to kill themselves off. So, as the care was running low on gasyou would think there would be a discussion about what will happen when the car runs out of gas.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #16

                theroscoevine — 9 years ago(September 01, 2016 10:13 AM)

                I would most definitely have been more satisfied if they had just gotten eaten, or blown up, or split apart, or whatever. The suicide pact was just straight up corny beep A bloody end with a monster attack would've made waaaaaaay more sense.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #17

                  CharlotteGoldenblatt — 9 years ago(July 09, 2016 12:46 PM)

                  Couldn't agree more. The only time I'd use that bullet on my son was if the monsters were literally eating him and I'd have to put him out of his misery.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #18

                    mountaindewslave — 9 years ago(July 14, 2016 08:43 PM)

                    I agree that its a bit strange that they gave up as soon as the car went down
                    however to give them a TINY bit of credit, earlier in the film ANYONE who walked for like 3 seconds in the Mist seemed to die. It did seem rather inevitable that some sort of monster would kill them immediately when they left
                    The ending is poor because of the practically impossible timing, he kills them in pity/goodness (lame I know but whatever) and 1 minute later the military rolls through? pretty sure you'd hear that in advance if they were entering the area battling. Granted I guess the fog was moving back/away but still
                    its lame in some respects but very effective
                    she fell through a hole, and was never seen again

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #19

                      StinkyGreenBud — 9 years ago(July 17, 2016 08:53 PM)

                      So many of these same threads on how tough all of you are. None of us have been in a situation like this before. You have no idea how you would react. Everyone thinking they are action heroes. Life is not a movie guys. The stress and fear from this would show your true colors.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #20

                        andrewpi7 — 9 years ago(July 19, 2016 06:27 PM)

                        The original post said (s)he would just stay in the car. That's not movie action hero stuff at all. They said they may fight to the end or may do suicide after the car is attacked - they didn't say they knew 100% for sure.
                        Life is not a movie and we all know what happens to people when they kill their kids only because one day they find themselves stressed or scared.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #21

                          Minus_The_Beer — 9 years ago(August 29, 2016 08:23 AM)

                          Kind of seemed a hopeless situation to me. Then again, I actually paid attention to the movie.
                          Being killed instantly by a bullet would be preferable to being harvested by giant insects, but hey, what do I know?
                          Anyone here mentions Hotel California dies before the first line clears his lips.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #22

                            zigomanis18 — 9 years ago(August 29, 2016 06:19 PM)

                            Yeah it was hopeless, but why would you not stop for gas and take a chance rather that let your car run out of gas and know you left yourself with no chance. The book ending ( Alternative ) he says he has about 90 miles left and will look to siphon gas. That actually makes much more sense.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #23

                              Minus_The_Beer — 9 years ago(August 30, 2016 02:57 PM)

                              The book ending ( Alternative ) he says he has about 90 miles left and will look to siphon gas. That actually makes much more sense.
                              Sure. But if they had gone with that ending, we wouldn't be talking about it right now. It's just not a terribly compelling stopping point. Fact is, love it or hate it, the ending they chose really helped to define the movie.
                              Anyone here mentions Hotel California dies before the first line clears his lips.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #24

                                zigomanis18 — 9 years ago(August 30, 2016 03:07 PM)

                                I gotta give you that. It does define the flick. Cannot argue that.
                                But for me, I still would have liked the flick as much with the book ending..which to me is FAR more gloomy. Yeah, the 4 characters are dead, but otherwise it's a happy ending. The mist is gone and humanity has won. TEH book ending is FAR more hopeless and creepy overall.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  fgadmin
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #25

                                  debunkerboy — 9 years ago(August 30, 2016 03:38 PM)

                                  Without the ending the movie would be unremarkable. As it is the film will be talked about for a very long time. But that doesn't make it right. There are good and bad ways to attain notoriety. Ryan Lochte for example.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    fgadmin
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #26

                                    zigomanis18 — 9 years ago(August 30, 2016 04:15 PM)

                                    I actually disagree. The ending makes people talk..but the movie was great either way. I cant think that the last 5 minutes of the movie was THE sole reason for the popularity. I disagree. We will never know of coursebut I think this movie with the book ending ( Which can be seen as the alternative ending on youtube ) is just as strong.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • F Offline
                                      F Offline
                                      fgadmin
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #27

                                      treetherealest — 9 years ago(September 04, 2016 06:56 PM)

                                      I think most people commenting here missed the part where the son asked the father to make the best promise he could possibly make that he would not let the monsters get him no matter what.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • F Offline
                                        F Offline
                                        fgadmin
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #28

                                        andrewpi7 — 9 years ago(September 04, 2016 09:30 PM)

                                        I think most people would think a child saying that is simply a child just saying they are scared and asking for their parent to protect them. I doubt any child that age has a "read between the lines" hidden message of assisted suicide in it.
                                        Even if the child specifically asked for assisted suicide before letting the monsters get him, which he didn't, and the dad wanted to make sure the monsters wouldn't get him "no matter what" then the dad should have killed the boy in the store. It wouldn't make any sense taking the boy into the parking lot's mist where the dad knew countless monsters have killed several adults and that there was no guarantee even the dad would make it to the vehicle, much less a child.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • F Offline
                                          F Offline
                                          fgadmin
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #29

                                          treetherealest — 9 years ago(September 05, 2016 09:57 AM)

                                          Well, it doesn't matter what the child meant, it meant how the father interpreted it. You have a point of how them going outside to escape put the child in the way of harm. However, he was doing that in what he viewed as a last means to escape. Once the car ran out of gas, he pretty much thought that was the end, as they had no more of a game plan after that.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups